Characterisation of ballen quartz and cristobalite in impact breccias: new observations and constraints on ballen formation

Abstract

Ballen quartz and cristobalite in impactite samples from five impact structures (Bosumtwi, Chicxulub, Mien, Ries, and Rochechouart) were investigated by optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), cathodoluminescence (CL), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and Raman spectroscopy to better understand ballen formation. The occurrence of so-called ''ballen quartz'' has been reported from about one in five of the known terrestrial impact structures, mostly from clasts in impact melt rock and, more rarely, in suevite. ''Ballen silica'', with either a-quartz or a-cristobalite structure, occurs as independent clasts or within diaplectic quartz glass or lechatelierite inclusions. Ballen are more or less spheroidal, in some cases elongate (ovoid) bodies that range in size from 8 to 214 mm, and either intersect or penetrate each other or abut each other. Based mostly on optical microscopic observations and Raman spectroscopy, we distinguish five types of ballen silica: a-cristobalite ballen with homogeneous extinction (type I); ballen a-quartz with homogeneous extinction (type II), with heterogeneous extinction (type III), and with intraballen recrystallisation (type IV); chert-like recristallized ballen a-quartz (type V). For the first time, coesite has been identified within ballen silica-in the form of tiny inclusions and exclusively within ballen of type I. The formation of ballen involves an impact-triggered solid-solid transition from a-quartz to diaplectic quartz glass, followed by the formation at high temperature of ballen of b-cristobalite and/or b-quartz, and finally back-transformation to a-cristobalite and/or a-quartz; or a solid-liquid transition from quartz to lechatelierite followed by nucleation and crystal growth at high temperature. The different types of ballen silica are interpreted as the result of back-transformation of b-cristobalite and/or b-quartz to a-cristobalite and/or to a-quartz with time. In nature, ballen silica has not been found anywhere else but associated with impact structures and, thus, these features could be added to the list of impact-diagnostic criteria.

A unique basaltic micrometeorite expands the inventory of solar system planetary crusts

“…In that respect, it is interesting to have identified quartz as the SiO 2 polymorph. The presence of quartz together with the absence of coesite/stishovite shows that MM40 was little shocked (41), with a shock pressure probably below a few Gpa (42), demonstrating that metamorphism due to impact can extend far away from the shock region.…”

“…These clasts found in Tieschitz (H/L 3.6), Manych (LL3.4), and Bovedy (L3) have less calcic and more sodic plagioclase compositions (An 80 -85Al 16 -19 ) than MM40 (An 88 Al 12 ). Low-calcium pyroxenes from these clasts have compositions far more magnesia-rich (En 72-88 ) than MM40 (En [39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48] ). Finally, these clasts contain abundant olivine (24)(25)(26) which is absent from MM40.…”

Enigmatic tubular features in impact glass: REPLY

“…McLoughlin and Grosch argue that a biogenic origin is unsupported by the data, and that astrobiological implications are unwarranted. In their Comment, they raise three main issues: (1) additional possible abiotic mechanisms; (2) inappropriate comparison between volcanic and impact glasses; and (3) tenuous, or incomplete evidence for endogenicity.McLoughlin and Grosch suggest the products of shock metamorphism could account for the tubules specifically citing ballen silica presented in Ferrière et al (2009). Ferrière et al (2009 figure 2) present a shocked silica clast containing ballen α-cristobalite with (open) fractures/veinlets of, in part, altered coesite.…”

“…McLoughlin and Grosch suggest the products of shock metamorphism could account for the tubules specifically citing ballen silica presented in Ferrière et al (2009). Ferrière et al (2009 figure 2) present a shocked silica clast containing ballen α-cristobalite with (open) fractures/veinlets of, in part, altered coesite.…”

“…Ferrière et al (2009, their figure 2) present a shocked silica clast containing ballen α-cristobalite with (open) fractures/veinlets of, in part, altered coesite. These features differ from the Ries tubules in (1) appearance-ballen silica are not tubular but approximate spheroidal bodies that interpenetrate each other; and (2) composition-ballen textures occur exclusively in pure silica; the Ries tubular features occur in chemically complex glasses.…”