2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2016.03.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterisation of archaeological ceramics from the Khwebe Hills of northern Botswana

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The two proposed indices (CIA/ICV) are currently used by geologist to estimate the alteration/degradation of rocks (Nesbitt and Young, 1982;Cox et al, 1995). Lately, they were also applied for the characterization of archaeological ceramic samples (Diskin and Ashley, 2016;Hoeck et al, 2009). The average CIA levels (presented in Table 3) reveal the extent of the chemical degradation of the ceramic samples: two of the samples (2 and 3) could be categorized as exhibiting "little degradation effect" (CIA<50), while the rest present moderate degradation effect (Diskin and Ashley, 2016).…”
Section: Characterization Of Lba Ceramicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The two proposed indices (CIA/ICV) are currently used by geologist to estimate the alteration/degradation of rocks (Nesbitt and Young, 1982;Cox et al, 1995). Lately, they were also applied for the characterization of archaeological ceramic samples (Diskin and Ashley, 2016;Hoeck et al, 2009). The average CIA levels (presented in Table 3) reveal the extent of the chemical degradation of the ceramic samples: two of the samples (2 and 3) could be categorized as exhibiting "little degradation effect" (CIA<50), while the rest present moderate degradation effect (Diskin and Ashley, 2016).…”
Section: Characterization Of Lba Ceramicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lately, they were also applied for the characterization of archaeological ceramic samples (Diskin and Ashley, 2016;Hoeck et al, 2009). The average CIA levels (presented in Table 3) reveal the extent of the chemical degradation of the ceramic samples: two of the samples (2 and 3) could be categorized as exhibiting "little degradation effect" (CIA<50), while the rest present moderate degradation effect (Diskin and Ashley, 2016). However, the two samples in question present fundamental differences when evaluating the two sides of the ceramic: if sample 2 presents values <50 of the CIA for both sides, sample 3 presents very low CIA value for the a side (<20) and a high value for the b side (>70).…”
Section: Characterization Of Lba Ceramicsmentioning
confidence: 99%