2020
DOI: 10.1136/openhrt-2020-001331
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterisation of aortic stenosis severity: a retrospective analysis of echocardiography reports in a clinical laboratory

Abstract: ObjectiveTo evaluate how common echocardiographic metrics of aortic stenosis (AS) influence the proportion of patients who may be categorised as having severe stenosis and therefore considered for valve replacement.MethodsRetrospective analysis was performed of all echocardiograms with aortic valve area (AVA) ≤1.2 cm2 and peak jet velocity (Vmax) ≥3 m/s from 1 December 2014 through 30 October 2017 at a single academic medical centre. Echocardiographic indices collected include AVA, Vmax, left ventricular eject… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…replacements. 6 Pathologically, computed tomographic imaging and echocardiography studies confirmed that women have lower calcification and more fibrous collagen in aortic valves relative to men with equivalent hemodynamic disease severity, 3,4,7,8 suggesting a sexually dimorphic valve stiffening process. 2 Although ≈12.4% of patients >75 years of age develop AVS, 9 there are no effective biomolecular treatments to slow or halt AVS progression in patients of either sex.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…replacements. 6 Pathologically, computed tomographic imaging and echocardiography studies confirmed that women have lower calcification and more fibrous collagen in aortic valves relative to men with equivalent hemodynamic disease severity, 3,4,7,8 suggesting a sexually dimorphic valve stiffening process. 2 Although ≈12.4% of patients >75 years of age develop AVS, 9 there are no effective biomolecular treatments to slow or halt AVS progression in patients of either sex.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In recent years, new categories of AS subtypes have emerged on the basis of different combinations of these echocardiography‐derived hemodynamic parameters: severe AS with high‐gradient (HG), low‐EF low‐flow low‐gradient (Low EF LFLG), paradoxical low‐flow low‐gradient (PLFLG), and normal‐flow low‐gradient (NFLG). Discordant hemodynamic parameters consisting of a small aortic valve area (AVA) associated with low gradients, are present in up to 40% of patients, 6–14 yielding uncertainty regarding the severity of AS and benefit to be derived from surgical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement (AVR) and sowing uncertainty in the optimal definition of severe AS 15 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%