2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0014-2999(01)00943-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterisation of agonist binding on human 5-HT2C receptor isoforms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In these brains, 5-HT 2C receptor isoforms with reduced function were expressed at significantly increased levels, suggesting that the regulation of editing by synaptic 5-HT is defective [84]. Decreased agonist binding affinity has also been linked to RNA editing, however antagonist binding remained unaltered [85].…”
Section: -Ht 2c Receptor Structure Signal Trans-duction and Pharmacmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these brains, 5-HT 2C receptor isoforms with reduced function were expressed at significantly increased levels, suggesting that the regulation of editing by synaptic 5-HT is defective [84]. Decreased agonist binding affinity has also been linked to RNA editing, however antagonist binding remained unaltered [85].…”
Section: -Ht 2c Receptor Structure Signal Trans-duction and Pharmacmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, Ro60,0175 also markedly activated Gq/11 in frontal cortex. This compound was originally described as a selective 5-HT 2C receptor agonist (Boes et al, 1997;Cussac et al, 2002a;Porter et al, 1999;Quirk et al, 2001), but its selectivity for these receptors has been contested and Ro60,0175 behaves as a full agonist at 5-HT 2B receptors both in rat brain and in CHO cell lines (Cussac et al, 2002b;Martin et al, 1998;Porter et al, 1999). Clearly, as further discussed in following text, the present data show that Ro,60,175 engages cerebral populations of 5-HT 2A receptors, albeit at concentrations higher than those stimulating 5-HT 2B and 5-HT 2C sites (Cussac et al, 2002b).…”
Section: Discussion Evidence For Activation Of Gq/11 By 5-ht Doi Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All classes of 5-HT 2 receptors are characterized by relatively low affinity for 5-HT as compared to the 5-HT 2A/2C receptor agonist and hallucinogen DOI (Barnes and Sharp, 1999). Interestingly, the indoline derivative Ro60,0175 has been extensively used as an agonist of 5-HT 2C (and 5-HT 2B ) sites (Boes et al, 1997;Martin et al, 1998;Porter et al, 1999;Quirk et al, 2001). Certain functional studies indicate that it may also stimulate 5-HT 2A receptors (Cussac et al, 2002b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We trained three separate groups of pigeons to discriminate one of the following drugs from saline: MK212, an agonist (Quirk et al 2001); methysergide, a neutral antagonist (Barker et al 1994;Herrick-Davis et al 1997); or mianserin, an inverse agonist (Barker et al 1994;Devlin et al 2004;Schlag et al 2004). A range of additional compounds with varying intrinsic efficacies measured in vitro were examined for substitution or combination: agonists mCPP (Quirk et al 2001;Schlag et al 2004) and WAY-163909 (Dunlop et al 2005;Marquis et al 2007); neutral antagonists 2-bromo-(+)-lysergic acid diethylamide (BOL; Barker et al 1994) and potentially metergoline (Bray and Goddard 2008;Cussac et al 2002;Labrecque et al 1995); and inverse agonists SB206,553 (Chanrion et al 2008;Marion et al 2004), ketanserin (Barker et al 1994), and cyproheptadine (Barker et al 1994).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%