2020
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterisation of 22445 patients attending UK emergency departments with suspected COVID-19 infection: Observational cohort study

Abstract: Background Hospital emergency departments play a crucial role in the initial assessment and management of suspected COVID-19 infection. This needs to be guided by studies of people presenting with suspected COVID-19, including those admitted and discharged, and those who do not ultimately have COVID-19 confirmed. We aimed to characterise patients attending emergency departments with suspected COVID-19, including subgroups based on sex, ethnicity and COVID-19 test results. Methods and findings We undertook a … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
38
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
38
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The sample size was dependent on the size and severity of the pandemic, but based on a previous study in the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic we estimated we would need to collect data from 20,000 patients across 40–50 hospitals to identify 200 (1%) with an adverse outcome, giving sufficient power for model derivation. In the event, the adverse outcome rate in adults was much higher in the COVID-19 pandemic (22%) [ 7 ], giving us adequate power to undertake derivation and validation of triage tools to predict all three outcomes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The sample size was dependent on the size and severity of the pandemic, but based on a previous study in the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic we estimated we would need to collect data from 20,000 patients across 40–50 hospitals to identify 200 (1%) with an adverse outcome, giving sufficient power for model derivation. In the event, the adverse outcome rate in adults was much higher in the COVID-19 pandemic (22%) [ 7 ], giving us adequate power to undertake derivation and validation of triage tools to predict all three outcomes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The United Kingdom (UK) Department of Health and Social Care activated PRIEST on 20 March 2020 to develop and evaluate triage tools in the COVID-19 pandemic. Initial descriptive analysis of the PRIEST data showed that adults presenting to the ED with suspected COVID-19 have much higher rates of COVID-19 positivity, hospital admission and adverse outcome than children [ 7 ]. We therefore decided to undertake separate studies in adults and children, and only develop a new triage tools in adults, which we present here.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We only included patients who were admitted to hospital after ED assessment because DNAR planning was considered unlikely to be routinely undertaken for discharged patients and would be limited to a minority of highly selected cases. We also only included adults (age ≥ 16 years) because previous analysis [15] showed that children with suspected COVID-19 had very low rates of confirmed COVID-19 or adverse outcome.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Pandemic Respiratory Infection Emergency System Triage (PRIEST) study was established to develop and evaluate triage tools for people presenting to hospital emergency departments with suspected COVID-19. [15] DNAR status was recorded to facilitate evaluation of triage tools in pre-specified subgroups. We present a post hoc secondary analysis of patients admitted with suspected COVID-19 that aims to describe their characteristics and outcomes according to their DNAR status and identify factors associated with recording of a DNAR decision.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The probability that a patient admitted to hospital has clinical symptoms indicative of COVID-19 is conditional on whether the patient has or has not been infected with SARS-CoV-2. For patients hospitalised because of a SARS-CoV-2 infection, the proportion with clinical symptoms was set at 95.5% using the value reported by Docherty et al 9 We estimated the proportion of patients who have not been infected with SARS-CoV-2 but who nevertheless have symptoms indicative of COVID-19 using data presented in Goodacre et al 6 and Docherty et al 9 Goodacre et al 6 provide the number of patients admitted to hospital who are suspected of having COVID-19 based on clinical assessment that noted that the diagnostic criteria for COVID-19 at the time the data were collected were fever (i.e. temperature of ≥ 37.8°C) and presence of at least one of a number of clinical conditions that had to be of acute onset: persistent cough (with or without sputum), hoarseness, nasal discharge or congestion, shortness of breath, sore throat, wheezing or sneezing.…”
Section: The Prevalence Of Clinical Symptoms Indicative Of Covid-19 Imentioning
confidence: 99%