2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2013.10.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterisation and expression of myogenesis regulatory factors during in vitro myoblast development and in vivo fasting in the gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

8
43
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
8
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The expression in bone and muscle of the inhibitor myostatin (mstn2) showed an inverse profile suggesting an inter-organ coordination that needs to be further explored in fish. Overall, this study provides new information on the molecules involved in the musculoskeletal system remodeling during the early stages of refeeding in fish.conditions has been characterized and the ratio of the circulating levels of Gh and Igf1 is considered a good marker of growth quality in terms of its relation with body indexes or muscle fibers composition 12,13 .Muscle growth is also controlled by myogenic regulatory factors (MRFs) (MyoD, Myf5, Myog and Mrf4), and the negative endogenous regulator myostatin, as well as other factors that control sequentially the process of development and growth 6,14,15 . The effects of fasting and refeeding on myogenesis have been studied in diverse fish species 6,10,16 demonstrating the function of the different MRFs during the metabolic arrest caused with food limitation and the subsequent activation when feeding is restored.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The expression in bone and muscle of the inhibitor myostatin (mstn2) showed an inverse profile suggesting an inter-organ coordination that needs to be further explored in fish. Overall, this study provides new information on the molecules involved in the musculoskeletal system remodeling during the early stages of refeeding in fish.conditions has been characterized and the ratio of the circulating levels of Gh and Igf1 is considered a good marker of growth quality in terms of its relation with body indexes or muscle fibers composition 12,13 .Muscle growth is also controlled by myogenic regulatory factors (MRFs) (MyoD, Myf5, Myog and Mrf4), and the negative endogenous regulator myostatin, as well as other factors that control sequentially the process of development and growth 6,14,15 . The effects of fasting and refeeding on myogenesis have been studied in diverse fish species 6,10,16 demonstrating the function of the different MRFs during the metabolic arrest caused with food limitation and the subsequent activation when feeding is restored.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In agreement with this observation, PCR experiments showed that levels of myogenin promoter-driven GFP transcript and myogenin transcripts were similar in muscle from fasted and fed trout. Similarly, it has been shown that myogenin expression is not affected after fasting in juvenile gilthead sea bream (Garcia de la Serrana et al, 2014). In line with the lasting production of myofibres in atrophied muscle, it is interesting to note that the catabolic response induced by shortterm calorie restriction is favourable to myogenic cell activation and muscle repair in mouse (Cerletti et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Furthermore, myogenin levels in Nile tilapia juveniles measured at the first 2 weeks of fasting (2WF) and after 10 weeks of refeeding (10WR) did not differ in relation to FC. In gilthead sea bream, myogenin gene expression was also found to not be affected after 30 days of food deprivation (Garcia et al 2014). MyoD expression can be expected to be reduced in fasting fish as the lack of available nutrient energy would preclude muscle development and growth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%