2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11032-014-0144-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterisation and development of EST-SSR markers in tree peony using transcriptome sequences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
73
6

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
5
73
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The 21 (35%) polymorphic genic SSR markers were identified among two populations (Table S7). This rate is less than those documented for R. rex (63%) [25] and P. suffruticosa (39.90%) [55] but higher than J. mandshurica Maxim. (30.8%) [57] and E. sibiricus (22.4%) [8].…”
Section: Validation Of Est-ssr Markerscontrasting
confidence: 58%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The 21 (35%) polymorphic genic SSR markers were identified among two populations (Table S7). This rate is less than those documented for R. rex (63%) [25] and P. suffruticosa (39.90%) [55] but higher than J. mandshurica Maxim. (30.8%) [57] and E. sibiricus (22.4%) [8].…”
Section: Validation Of Est-ssr Markerscontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…The average of observed heterozygosity and expected heterozygosity was 0.614 and 0.552, respectively. The PIC value is usually used to evaluate the level of genetic information [55]. Our results showed that the PIC value fluctuates from 0.074 and 0.855, and the mean value was 0.504, which is also the middle level.…”
Section: Validation Of Est-ssr Markersmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Individuals were genotyped using 22 EST‐SSR markers (Table ) distributed over five linkage groups according to the tree peony high‐density genetic linkage map (Cai, ; Peng et al, ). Details of nuclear microsatellite genotyping are described in Wu, Cai, Cheng, Cui, and Zhou (). In addition, three chloroplast (cp) DNA intergenic spacers ( pet B‐ pet D, acc D‐ psa I, and psb E‐ pet L) were sequenced across a subsample of 296 individuals (Table ) using the methods described in Grivet, Heinze, Vendramin, and Petit () and Suo et al ().…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among its numerous applications, it has significantly advanced the development of transcriptomederived SSR markers in a number of plant and animal species, including tree peony and yellow catfish (Wu et al, 2014;Zhang et al, 2014). In this study, using the Illumina Hiseq-2000 platform, we were able to analyze transcriptome ESTs, generate 142,950 contigs, and design a higher number of potential SSR primers (12,208) compared to previous studies of D. involucrata (Du et al, 2012;Li et al, 2012b;Tao et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%