2002
DOI: 10.1215/ijm/1258130986
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Character sums over integers with restricted $g$-ary digits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
44
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This follows from Lemma 2.3 (Weil's theorem) above by using an inequality of Vinogradov as presented by Niederreiter in [12] and Tietäväinen in [14] (see also [2], Lemma 2).…”
Section: Lemma 23 For Any Odd Prime P and Any Polynomialmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…This follows from Lemma 2.3 (Weil's theorem) above by using an inequality of Vinogradov as presented by Niederreiter in [12] and Tietäväinen in [14] (see also [2], Lemma 2).…”
Section: Lemma 23 For Any Odd Prime P and Any Polynomialmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Hegyvári and Sárközy [23,Theorem 2] give the bound f (p) < 12p 1/4 for sufficiently large p, which has been improved to F (p) ≤ p 1/5+o (1) as p → ∞, by Dietmann, Elsholtz and Shparlinski [14,Theorem 1.3]. Here we improve this further to F (p) ≤ p 3/19+o(1) and recall that reducing the exponent below 1/8 immediately implies an improvement of the Burgess bound on the least primitive root (note that 3/19 − 1/8 = 0.0328 .…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only property of Λ R1 (n), Λ R + 2 (m) that we will use from now on is that they are complex sequences bounded by O(log X) ℓ = (log X) Oη (1) . Explicitly, let α n = Λ R1 (n)n s2−s1 /(log X) ℓ+1 and β m = Λ R + 2 (m)m s2−s1 /(log X) ℓ+1 , and let γ a satisfy S A (a/X) = #Aγ a F X (a/X).…”
Section: Exceptional Minor Arcsmentioning
confidence: 99%