2015 13th International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/icdar.2015.7333777
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Character retrieval of vectorized cuneiform script

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This includes methods that process vectorized cuneiform, with the intermediate step of skeletonization. They use autograph-like 2D vector drawings generated from 3D-scanned cuneiform meshes [26] or raster images [27], to decompose vectorized cuneiform signs into wedge features, including the deinition of sign-level similarity measures [3] or decompose spline drawings into single wedges and cuneiform signs based on part-structured models [5], and convert the vector drawings into graph representations of cuneiform signs [4]. However, neither of these methods can provide a solution for the cuneiform classiication problem on photographic reproductions.…”
Section: Computer Aided Cuneiform Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This includes methods that process vectorized cuneiform, with the intermediate step of skeletonization. They use autograph-like 2D vector drawings generated from 3D-scanned cuneiform meshes [26] or raster images [27], to decompose vectorized cuneiform signs into wedge features, including the deinition of sign-level similarity measures [3] or decompose spline drawings into single wedges and cuneiform signs based on part-structured models [5], and convert the vector drawings into graph representations of cuneiform signs [4]. However, neither of these methods can provide a solution for the cuneiform classiication problem on photographic reproductions.…”
Section: Computer Aided Cuneiform Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Automatic optical character recognition cannot be used to reliably identify cuneiform signs, neither in their two-dimensional (2D) representations (hand copies) nor in three-dimensional (3D) scans of actual clay tablets (8)(9)(10)(11)(12). Various visual recognition algorithms are being applied to cuneiform, but the results are yet in their infancy (13)(14)(15)(16). Therefore, one has to rely on a limited corpus of manually transliterated texts.…”
Section: Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This wedge model includes wedge component based features, like edges and depth points and a heuristic classification of wedge types. Based on generating 2D contour line vector representations of wedges, Bogacz et al (2015a,b) proposed two approaches to classify cuneiform signs: One of them is based on graph representations, which are compared by graph kernels (Bogacz et al, 2015b), and the other computes the optimal assignment between vector representations (Bogacz et al, 2015a). Rothacker et al (2015) proposed a Bag-of-Features and HMM based approach for automatically retrieving cuneiform structures on image representations from 3D scans.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%