2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jog.2009.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Character of slip and stress due to interaction between fault segments along the dip direction of a subduction zone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
(131 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this framework, faults can be stressed well below failure (with a ratio of shear to normal stress, τ / σ n , lower than static friction μ s ) almost everywhere along the fault, yet break spontaneously. Only a small portion of the fault needs to reach failure to nucleate a rupture, and slip can propagate into regions of velocity‐ or slip‐strengthening frictional behavior (e.g., Kaneko et al., 2010; Thomas et al., 2014) depending on the patterns of static and dynamic stress transfer arising from the initial fault prestress and frictional properties (e.g., Ariyoshi et al., 2009; Cochard & Madariaga, 1996; Rundle et al., 1984). However, few dynamic rupture models exist for normal fault earthquakes and these are restricted to planar faults (Oglesby et al., 1998, 2000, 2008; Aochi, 2018; Aochi & Twardzik, 2020; Gallovič et al., 2019; Tinti et al., 2021); to the best of our knowledge dynamic rupture models have not been used to explore conditions allowing LANF rupture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this framework, faults can be stressed well below failure (with a ratio of shear to normal stress, τ / σ n , lower than static friction μ s ) almost everywhere along the fault, yet break spontaneously. Only a small portion of the fault needs to reach failure to nucleate a rupture, and slip can propagate into regions of velocity‐ or slip‐strengthening frictional behavior (e.g., Kaneko et al., 2010; Thomas et al., 2014) depending on the patterns of static and dynamic stress transfer arising from the initial fault prestress and frictional properties (e.g., Ariyoshi et al., 2009; Cochard & Madariaga, 1996; Rundle et al., 1984). However, few dynamic rupture models exist for normal fault earthquakes and these are restricted to planar faults (Oglesby et al., 1998, 2000, 2008; Aochi, 2018; Aochi & Twardzik, 2020; Gallovič et al., 2019; Tinti et al., 2021); to the best of our knowledge dynamic rupture models have not been used to explore conditions allowing LANF rupture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been observed that this segmentation has a strong influence on seismic rupture patterns [Burgmann et al, 2005;Hetland and Hager, 2006;Chlieh et al, 2008;Kaneko et al, 2010;Perfettini et al, 2010;Chlieh et al, 2011;Loveless and Meade, 2011]: locked segments may rupture independently or together with neighboring patches, producing irregular earthquakes of different sizes. This complex behavior arises from the interaction of stress transfer, levels of prestress, and fault friction properties [Rundle et al, 1984;Cochard and Madariaga, 1996;Ariyoshi et al, 2009;Kaneko et al, 2010].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Q: Quaternary stream terrace and alluvial fan deposits close to point A, T: Tertiary sandstone and siltstone (Rockwell et al 1984). Ventura anticline (see folded Q unit) formed due to crustal shortening above the Ventura fault (Hubbard et al 2014) enough and exhibit 'stick-slip' behavior (Ampuero and Rubin 2008;Ariyoshi et al 2009). We test three frictional behaviors for the décollement: velocitystrengthening (Case 1), unstable velocity-weakening (Case 2), and conditionally stable velocity-weakening (Case 3).…”
Section: Modeling Assumptions: Fault Geometry and Friction Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%