2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2012.09.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Character, mass, distribution, and origin of tephra-fall deposits from the 2009 eruption of Redoubt Volcano, Alaska—Highlighting the significance of particle aggregation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
97
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
4
97
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3a, 4a) is consistent with the distribution of tephra-fall deposits measured for these events ( Fig. 5; Wallace et al 2013). Estimated plume distributions calculated using the US Standard Atmosphere remain fixed over the vent and overshoot the measured plume heights in excess of 1500 m.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…3a, 4a) is consistent with the distribution of tephra-fall deposits measured for these events ( Fig. 5; Wallace et al 2013). Estimated plume distributions calculated using the US Standard Atmosphere remain fixed over the vent and overshoot the measured plume heights in excess of 1500 m.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Other works employing Eulerian models to simulate ash deposition from the same eruptive event had similar issues for many model runs in the far field using a similar model set-up [44,51]. Potential sources of error for all studies include distinguishing between ash layers from different eruptive events in the field [43], issues with wind field resolution through high elevation regions, and ash aggregation effects (discussed below in detail) that are not currently treated by any volcanic transport model.…”
Section: Constraining Vatdmsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Error can be introduced when determining the height of the plume, which is often deduced from seismic data or reported by pilots in the area. Another technique that is often used involves erupted masses determined from mapped deposits and the seismic durations of eruptive events [43,44], but this technique relies on the assumption that MFR is constant over the entire duration of the eruptive episode. The success of this method hinges upon a thorough and timely sampling of the eruptive deposits, including only ash deposited from the relevant eruptive event.…”
Section: Constraining Vatdmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations