1980
DOI: 10.1143/ptps.68.359
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chapter V. Microscopic Study of the Interaction between Complex Nuclei

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
8
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Matsuse et al [26] represented the effect of the partly Pauli forbidden states in e-160 scattering by means of a trivially equivalent local potential in a resonating group calculation and found that this potential is repulsive in the contact region (4-6 fm) of the nuclei and produces sharper resonances. Similar conclusions were drawn by Tohsaki-Suzuki et al [27] in 160-160 scattering. It was shown by Schmid et al [23] for c~-c~ and c~ -160 scattering, in the context of the fish bone optical model, that particularly the partly Pauli forbidden states manifest themselves as a barrier (the "Pauli barrier") in the surface region of the corresponding trivially equivalent local potential.…”
Section: The Fish Bone Optical Potential and The Inversion Methodsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Matsuse et al [26] represented the effect of the partly Pauli forbidden states in e-160 scattering by means of a trivially equivalent local potential in a resonating group calculation and found that this potential is repulsive in the contact region (4-6 fm) of the nuclei and produces sharper resonances. Similar conclusions were drawn by Tohsaki-Suzuki et al [27] in 160-160 scattering. It was shown by Schmid et al [23] for c~-c~ and c~ -160 scattering, in the context of the fish bone optical model, that particularly the partly Pauli forbidden states manifest themselves as a barrier (the "Pauli barrier") in the surface region of the corresponding trivially equivalent local potential.…”
Section: The Fish Bone Optical Potential and The Inversion Methodsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…On the other hand, the fish bone optical model differs only by the use of norm kernel information from the purely phenomenological optical model. Although we did not investigate 160-160 scattering here, it is clear from the spectrum of norm kernel eigenvalues [tl] and from the resonating group calculations by Matsuse et al [6] and Ando et al [19] and by Tohsaki-Suzuki et al [7,20] that we have to expect a very sizeable Pauli barrier, in this case. As these authors point out, the strong repulsion produced by the Pauli principle should result in a rather shallow effective local potential, which is in agreement with previous phenomenological optical model analyses of 160-160 scattering [21,22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The authors also calculated the effect of the partly Pauli-forbidden states on the width of rotational resonances and found that the resonances become sharper. Tohsaki-Suzuki et al [7] analyse in a similar way the influence of partly Pauli-forbidden states on 160 -160 scattering and find that the trivial equivalent local potential is much stronger than in the e-160 case and that it is strongly energy-dependent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for core = 4He , S( C)= 2( vR 1 • R2)2 for core= 16 where the radial form factor u(x) of the effective two-nucleon force is supposed to be Here, as in the previous paper I, x stands for the number of nucleons exchanged (NNE) between Z and core and q specifies the types of kernels, q=a, b, c, dI and dII • The kernels of the types dI and dII change into the other when RI and Rz are exchanged and are called commonly d-type in 1. For certain pairs of (x, q), P Xq , QXq or Rxq is not existent in Eq.…”
Section: Analytical Calculation Of Rgm Kernels Of the Systems Of "Os-mentioning
confidence: 99%