Abstract. The abundance of dark matter satellites and subhalos, the existence of density cusps at the centers of dark matter halos, and problems producing realistic disk galaxies in simulations are issues that have raised concerns about the viability of the standard cold dark matter (ΛCDM) scenario for galaxy formation. This talk reviews these issues, and considers the implications for cold vs. various varieties of warm dark matter (WDM). The current evidence appears to be consistent with standard ΛCDM, although improving data may point toward a rather tepid version of ΛWDM -tepid since the dark matter cannot be very warm without violating observational constraints.
Keywords
DARK MATTER IS OUR FRIENDDark matter preserved the primordial fluctuations in cosmological density on galaxy scales that were wiped out in baryonic matter by momentum transport (viscosity) as radiation decoupled from baryons in the first few hundred thousand years after the big bang. The growth of dark matter halos started early enough to result in the formation of galaxies that we see even at high redshifts z > 6. Dark matter halos provide most of the gravitation within which stable structures formed in the universe. Dark matter halos preserve these galaxies, groups, and clusters as the dark energy tears apart unbound structures and expands the space between bound structures such as the Local Group of galaxies. Thus we owe our existence and future to dark matter.Cold dark matter theory [1] including cosmic inflation has become the basis for the standard modern ΛCDM cosmology, which is favored by analysis of the available cosmic microwave background data and large scale structure data over even more complicated variant theories having additional parameters [2]. Most of the cosmological density is nonbaryonic dark matter (about 23%) and dark energy (about 72%), with baryonic matter making up only about 4.6% and the visible baryons only about 0.5% of the cosmic density. The fact that dark energy and dark matter are dominant suggests a popular name for the modern standard cosmology: the "double dark" theory, as Nancy Abrams and I suggested in our recent book about modern cosmology and its broader implications [3].The physical nature of dark matter remains to be discovered. The two most popular ideas concerning the identity of the dark matter particles remain the lightest supersymmetric partner particle [4], also called supersymmetric weakly interacting