Chapter 9 Soil quality control

Pierce, Francis J.; Gilliland, Danny

doi:10.1016/s0166-2481(97)80036-0

Cited by 5 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Wang et al (1997) describes such a nation‐wide system established in Canada. Larson and Pierce (1994) and Pierce and Gilliland (1997) identify both computer models (which use attributes as variables) and statistical (i.e., temporal pattern of attribute mean and standard deviation) control as a means to assess soil quality change over time. Other approaches are use of archived soil and plant samples from long‐term experiments and use of geostatistical methods (Wendroth et al, 1997).…”

Section: Soil Quality and Soil Organic Mattermentioning

confidence: 99%

Soil Quality for Sustainable Land Management

Carter

2002

Agronomy Journal

465

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Soil quality concepts are commonly used to evaluate sustainable land management in agroecosystems. The objectives of this review were to trace the importance of soil organic matter (SOM) in Canadian sustainable land management studies and illustrate the role of SOM and aggregation in sustaining soil functions. Canadian studies on soil quality were initiated in the early 1980s and showed that loss of SOM and soil aggregate stability were standard features of nonsustainable land use. Subsequent studies have evaluated SOM quality using the following logical sequence: soil purpose and function, processes, properties and indicators, and methodology. Limiting steps in this soil quality framework are the questions of critical limits and standardization for soil properties. At present, critical limits for SOM are selected using a commonly accepted reference value or based on empirically derived relations between SOM and a specific soil process or function (e.g., soil fertility, productivity, or erodibility). Organic matter fractions (e.g., macro‐organic matter, light fraction, microbial biomass, and mineralizable C) describe the quality of SOM. These fractions have biological significance for several soil functions and processes and are sensitive indicators of changes in total SOM. Total SOM influences soil compactibility, friability, and soil water‐holding capacity while aggregated SOM has major implications for the functioning of soil in regulating air and water infiltration, conserving nutrients, and influencing soil permeability and erodibility. Overall, organic matter inputs, the dynamics of the sand‐sized macro‐organic matter, and the soil aggregation process are important factors in maintaining and regulating organic matter functioning in soil.

show abstract