2009
DOI: 10.1016/s0074-7742(09)87009-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chapter 9 Artificial Scaffolds for Peripheral Nerve Reconstruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
73
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 127 publications
0
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, one of the reasons silicone or similar material conduits fail as nerve guidance conduits is their lack of degradation. As new tissues form, the continued presence of silicone prevents tissue growth and impedes regeneration due to compression [30,31,9,32]. Here, we studied the degradation properties of PCL alone, as a commonly used material control, and PCL with bioactive borate glass particles, bioactive silicate glass particles, or a blend of both.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, one of the reasons silicone or similar material conduits fail as nerve guidance conduits is their lack of degradation. As new tissues form, the continued presence of silicone prevents tissue growth and impedes regeneration due to compression [30,31,9,32]. Here, we studied the degradation properties of PCL alone, as a commonly used material control, and PCL with bioactive borate glass particles, bioactive silicate glass particles, or a blend of both.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[22][23][24] The advantage of minimally invasive electrodiagnostic methods that allow periodic evaluation of reinnervation at predefined time intervals without euthanizing the animals or interfering with the progress of regeneration 16 seems not to be widely recognized or routinely used to assess the progress of peripheral nerve regeneration. 17 The development of tissue-engineered nerve grafts is an emerging field, [25][26][27][28] and evaluation protocols that allow objective assessment of different regeneration parameters are of high importance. 17,29 For observation periods that usually last several months it would be advantageous to use a measure to closely monitor regeneration-related changes within the nerve to distinguish promising approaches from less fruitful ones as early as possible.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schwann cells are the most frequently used cells for evaluating the peripheral regeneration process [23], because they could produce growth factor and secrete extracellular matrix for the formation of myelin sheaths in nerve regeneration [10,24]. Thus, in this study Schwann cells culture were used to preliminary assess the feasibility of using the charge processed CS scaffolds for potential application in peripheral nerve regeneration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%