2018
DOI: 10.1075/slcs.196.06nef
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chapter 6. Languages and other abstract structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“… See Chomsky (1986) for the received psychological view on the ontology of linguistics,Katz & Postal (1991) for a Platonist interpretation,Devitt (2006) for a non-psychological physicalist view, and Stainton (2014) for a mixture of all the above. SeeNefdt (2018) for an alternative mixture of these views.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… See Chomsky (1986) for the received psychological view on the ontology of linguistics,Katz & Postal (1991) for a Platonist interpretation,Devitt (2006) for a non-psychological physicalist view, and Stainton (2014) for a mixture of all the above. SeeNefdt (2018) for an alternative mixture of these views.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike Platonists, who claim among other things that languages are individual abstract objects like sets, or mentalists, who claim they are psychological or internal states of the brain, a structuralist could argue that languages are complex structures in part identified by abstract rules and physical properties. SeeNefdt (2018) for precisely such a view.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%