2010
DOI: 10.1108/s1877-6361(2009)0000006007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chapter 6 Autopoiesis and Critical Social Systems Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
7

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
10
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, resilience would be achieved in a morally just manner. Essentially, this is the true meaning of Social Auropoiesis (Fuchs & Hofkirchner, 2009). Society reproduces and produces man as a social being, and man reproduces and produces society by socially coordinating human actions: a dialectic of social structures and human actors.…”
Section: Identification Of the Threats And Resilience Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, resilience would be achieved in a morally just manner. Essentially, this is the true meaning of Social Auropoiesis (Fuchs & Hofkirchner, 2009). Society reproduces and produces man as a social being, and man reproduces and produces society by socially coordinating human actions: a dialectic of social structures and human actors.…”
Section: Identification Of the Threats And Resilience Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En consideraciones acerca de la ciencia, Luhmann (1997: 419-420) fue explícito en negar esta posibilidad, con un planteamiento que vincula la autopoiesis con la objetividad, entendida en el sentido más limitado de ausencia de valores. Tal vez por ello algunos autores que piensan la intervención sistémica llegan al punto de promover una revisión crítica de la autopoiesis (Fuchs y Hofkirchner, 2009).…”
Section: Problema # 3 La Relación Conocimiento-sociedad Y La Interveunclassified
“…The emancipatory commitment of CST denounces any distortions that act to prevent open and ‘free’ dialogue (Fuchs & Hofkirchner, ). While deploring any context that prevents discussion is laudable, clearly such a view carries Habermasian overtones with the uncritical assumption that a universally understood ideal state is achievable.…”
Section: Recasting ‘Human Emancipation’ As ‘Emancipation’mentioning
confidence: 99%