Chapter 58 Cognitive behavioral approaches and neuropathic pain

Daniel, Hilary; Merwe, Johannes D. van der

doi:10.1016/s0072-9752(06)80062-x

Cited by 8 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 75 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It is hoped that future research will elicit whether aspects of cognitive behavioral pain management require adaptation to meet the needs of people with other neuropathic pain conditions (Daniel and Van Der Merwe, 2006). Adopting a significance level of 0.05 may have increased the likelihood of Type 1 errors.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, to our knowledge this is the first study to address differences between neuropathic and nociceptive pain and the implications for cognitive behavioral PMPs. It is hoped that future research will elicit whether aspects of cognitive behavioral pain management require adaptation to meet the needs of people with other neuropathic pain conditions (Daniel and Van Der Merwe, 2006).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Comparison of psychological and physical function in neuropathic pain and nociceptive pain: Implications for cognitive behavioral pain management programs

Daniel

Narewska

Serpell

et al. 2008

European Journal of Pain

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Research has increased our understanding of the psychological and physical functioning associated with persistent pain and has facilitated the development of cognitive behavioral pain management programs to help improve people's physical function and decrease their distress in the presence of persistent pain. The majority of this research has focused on nociceptive pain or pain of mixed etiology. There has been less focus on these aspects of neuropathic pain. It is possible that differences exist in the function and difficulties associated with nociceptive and neuropathic pain. These differences may be associated with our clinical observation that some people with neuropathic pain have difficulty applying some aspects of the theory and practice of cognitive behavioral pain management. The purpose of this study was to compare a single neuropathic pain condition (post-herpetic neuralgia) with a persistent pain of nociceptive origin (low back pain) and determine whether differences exist in: (1) physical and psychological function; (2) factors that increase difficulties; (3) responses to pain; (4) beliefs about pain and (5) problems experienced. The results suggest that the differences between the two groups were not on the major variables of pain, mood, cognition and physical function. The main differences were in factors that increase pain, people's responses to pain, their beliefs about diagnosis and the cause of pain and the problems they reported as a result of experiencing pain. The implications of our findings for the development of cognitive behavioral pain management programs for people with neuropathic pain are discussed.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of psychological and physical function in neuropathic pain and nociceptive pain: Implications for cognitive behavioral pain management programs

Daniel

Narewska

Serpell

et al. 2008

European Journal of Pain

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…CBT represents a selected combination and integration of cognitive and behavioral treatments aimed at reducing the influence of factors that reinforce or maintain patients' maladaptive avoidance behaviors, assisting patients in addressing beliefs and self‐defeating patterns of thought about pain that interfere with functioning, and promoting assertiveness as well as learning strategies and coping skills to better manage pain, set goals, and improve stress management [133]. By enhancing self‐efficacy and the patients' internal sense of control for managing their pain, pain‐related distress is diminished, physical functioning is improved, and pain‐related disability may be reduced.…”

Section: Nonpharmacologic Approachesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Maldynia: Pathophysiology and Management of Neuropathic and Maladaptive Pain—A Report of the AMA Council on Science and Public Health

et al. 2010

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Mucocutaneous Pain Syndromes

Zakrzewska

Bewley

2016

Rook's Textbook of Dermatology, Ninth Edition

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The mucocutaneous pain syndromes (MCPs) typically involve the head, neck and mouth. Genital dysaesthetic syndromes (vulvodynia, vestibulodynia, penoscrotodynia) are also common and are discussed in this chapter, as well as in specific genital chapters. For many MCPs no organic cause for their disease can be identified (with the exception of post‐herpetic neuralgia and trigeminal trophic syndrome), and the causes are thought to be related to the complex physiological interaction between the cranial and peripheral nervous systems and the brain itself. It is therefore essential that organic differential diagnoses for MCPs are excluded before a firm diagnosis is established. The management of patients with these diseases is often complex. There is a growing body of evidence that these patients are best managed in specialist, multidisciplinary clinics.

show abstract

Chapter 58 Cognitive behavioral approaches and neuropathic pain

Cited by 8 publications

References 75 publications

Comparison of psychological and physical function in neuropathic pain and nociceptive pain: Implications for cognitive behavioral pain management programs

Comparison of psychological and physical function in neuropathic pain and nociceptive pain: Implications for cognitive behavioral pain management programs

Maldynia: Pathophysiology and Management of Neuropathic and Maladaptive Pain—A Report of the AMA Council on Science and Public Health

Mucocutaneous Pain Syndromes

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About