1999
DOI: 10.1016/s1573-4463(99)30044-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chapter 53 Recent developments in public sector labor markets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
221
0
14

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 208 publications
(251 citation statements)
references
References 114 publications
16
221
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…This is the case for countries having a small share of public employment in the labor market. The existence of such a positive premium is a well-documented empirical fact of developed economies, as shown in the surveys of Ehrenberg and Schwarz (1986), Bender (1998), and Gregory and Borland (1999). While there is little research on the determinants of the public wage premium, the literature on public sector labor markets reveals that the influence of public sector labor unions and the "vote producing" activities by civil servants are the potential reasons for the existence of the earnings differential.…”
Section: Householdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the case for countries having a small share of public employment in the labor market. The existence of such a positive premium is a well-documented empirical fact of developed economies, as shown in the surveys of Ehrenberg and Schwarz (1986), Bender (1998), and Gregory and Borland (1999). While there is little research on the determinants of the public wage premium, the literature on public sector labor markets reveals that the influence of public sector labor unions and the "vote producing" activities by civil servants are the potential reasons for the existence of the earnings differential.…”
Section: Householdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The broad question of the public-sector labour market is dealt with in the excellent survey by Gregory and Borland (1999) in the Handbook of Labor Economics. In this section, we will restrict ourselves to one broad question: that of the level of public-sector employment, as compared to the private sector.…”
Section: Public-and Private-sector Employmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While wage schedules in private enterprises are usually guided by profit-maximization, public administrators are influenced by political goals. They may use the State wage policy as a means to increase their popularity and gain support from the bureaucracy to pursue those goals, which easily results in higher wages for government employees (GREGORY and BORLAND, 1999). Moreover, if unionization is marked by corporatism, powerful unions operating in the wellorganized and legally protected segment of the labor market can, in fact, increase total inequality.…”
Section: Public Sector Wagesmentioning
confidence: 99%