Abstract:The Perspectives on Writing series addresses writing studies in a broad sense. Consistent with the wide ranging approaches characteristic of teaching and scholarship in writing across the curriculum, the series presents works that take divergent perspectives on working as a writer, teaching writing, administering writing programs, and studying writing in its various forms.The WAC Clearinghouse, Colorado State University Open Press, and University Press of Colorado are collaborating so that these books will be … Show more
“…A 2016 special issue of College English on writing assessment as social justice, edited by Poe and Inoue, featured two essays focusing on community college students (Alexander, 2016;Naynaha, 2016). Chapters in Poe, Inoue, and Elliot's collection Writing Assessment, Social Justice, and the Advancement of Opportunity also begin to address these gaps (Moreland, 2018;Toth, 2018a;2018b). However, many of these studies demonstrate little or no engagement with the scholarly literature in two-year college writing studies, and none were written by two-year college English faculty.…”
The WAC Clearinghouse supports teachers of writing across the disciplines. Hosted by Colorado State University, it brings together scholarly journals and book series as well as resources for teachers who use writing in their courses. This book is available in digital formats for free download at wac.colostate.edu.
“…A 2016 special issue of College English on writing assessment as social justice, edited by Poe and Inoue, featured two essays focusing on community college students (Alexander, 2016;Naynaha, 2016). Chapters in Poe, Inoue, and Elliot's collection Writing Assessment, Social Justice, and the Advancement of Opportunity also begin to address these gaps (Moreland, 2018;Toth, 2018a;2018b). However, many of these studies demonstrate little or no engagement with the scholarly literature in two-year college writing studies, and none were written by two-year college English faculty.…”
The WAC Clearinghouse supports teachers of writing across the disciplines. Hosted by Colorado State University, it brings together scholarly journals and book series as well as resources for teachers who use writing in their courses. This book is available in digital formats for free download at wac.colostate.edu.
“…Thus, these programs may unintentionally expand on racial inequalities. In addition, programs may rely on standardized tests, like College Board's ACCUPLACER, to admit and place students -which may disadvantage those groups that systemically under perform on these tests 3 by limiting their access to DE (Moreland, 2019). However, disaggregated data that could provide more robust analyses of potential concerns of placement exams was not available via public records requests -limiting transparency and the ability to examine how DE may address inequalities (Moreland, 2019).…”
The COVID-19 pandemic has threatened to widen racial educational achievement and attainment gaps in the United States, reinforcing a need to understand how education policy can work to advance racial equity. Dual enrollment (DE) programs offer a potential policy solution that could increase college-going for these students as participation has consistently been associated with increased rates of college-going and completion. These prior findings are heterogeneous among student demographics.This study expands on this prior research on DE by examining how access to DE and benefits from participation may have differential benefits based one's intersectional identities. Using a critical quantitative framework, QuantCrit, and multiple national datasets this study investigates three related questions. First, using IPEDS and the American Community Survey and logistic regression I investigate how do demographics of areas of the United States with limited access to widely accessible colleges and universities (called college access deserts) vary from those with greater access? I then consider access to DE with the U.S. Department of Education's Civil Rights Data Collection: 2017-18 and linear probability models by examining how access to DE varied across the United States, with attention to Black females and males. Finally, with the High School Longitudinal Study of 2009 and linear probability models, I investigate if participation in DE is associated with increased probabilities of attending postsecondary education and does this association vary for Black people based on their gender. I find that areas of the United States that have less access to widely accessible iii public colleges have lower proportions of Black people, but higher proportions of American Indian/Alaskan Native residents. Analysis of the Civil Rights Data Collection indicates that high schools with less access to widely accessible public colleges were more likely to offer DE. However, schools with higher percentages of Black students and male students are less likely to offer DE. The HSLS analysis shows that DE is positively associated with postsecondary attendance. Of postsecondary enrollees, DE participants were more likely to enroll in four-year institutions, but this increased probability may vary by gender as female DE participants had greater increased probabilities of enrolling in four-year institutions than male DE participants. Taken together, this study's findings indicate that DE can be a policy to advance postsecondary attendance for all students -however current access is racialized. These findings show that expanding DE for all students could increase postsecondary attendance. I conclude with recommendations for dual enrollment programs to broaden access in areas of the United States with widely accessible public colleges and the utility of open science and anti-racist quantitative methods in educational research.
“…Within the literature on socially just and antiracist writing program assessment, scholars have attended to professional development (Sassi, 2020), directed self-placement (Toth, 2020), dual enrollment (Moreland, 2020), program-wide grading contracts (Stuckey et al, 2020) and the assessment of student writing samples Poe & Zhang-Wu, 2020). This article aims to contribute to the last conversation on that list-assessing student writing samples.…”
Section: The Theory Of Antiracist Writing Program Assessmentmentioning
This article contributes to conversations about antiracist writing program assessment, with particular attention to the evaluation of first-year writing samples. In an effort to confront the racist ideologies of assimilation and neutrality, I employed a modified version of dynamic criteria mapping (DCM) that involved surveying students, conducting instructor focus groups, and analyzing writing prompts. The triangulated results informed the development of an assessment tool that was used to examine 89 writing samples. The goal of this assessment was not to produce a set of standards that mirror community values but rather to describe what was happening in the writing program and then use that information to facilitate critical reflection on the ways in which classroom practices align with or depart from the programmatic goal of delivering socially just writing instruction. By sharing my own experiences, I hope to help other writing program administrators (WPAs) develop processes for enacting antiracist writing assessment in their own contexts. I also reflect on the ways my procedure did—and did not—achieve its antiracist goals.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.