1990
DOI: 10.1016/s0080-8784(08)62556-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chapter 4 InP Crystal Growth, Substrate Preparation and Evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, it was also found that Fe-doping of InP decreases the pressure of transformation from zincblende to the rock-salt structure [11], which agrees with the results obtained for Se-doped InP [12]. On the other hand, doping with GaAs and InP causes an increase in microhardness, yield point, and also inhibits the generation of dislocations during crystal growth [13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. In other words, doping of GaAs and InP should increase the shear stress required for the generation of dislocations.…”
Section: Ofsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, it was also found that Fe-doping of InP decreases the pressure of transformation from zincblende to the rock-salt structure [11], which agrees with the results obtained for Se-doped InP [12]. On the other hand, doping with GaAs and InP causes an increase in microhardness, yield point, and also inhibits the generation of dislocations during crystal growth [13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. In other words, doping of GaAs and InP should increase the shear stress required for the generation of dislocations.…”
Section: Ofsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…In contrast, the analysis of experiments carried out for InP crystals (Figure 4b) reveals that the mean contact pressure of the pop-in event is higher for doped crystals. Since InP doping should increase the shear stress for nucleation of dislocations [15][16][17][18][19] and simultaneously decrease of the pressure of phase transformation [11,12], the conclusion can be formulated as follows: plasticity of the InP crystal induced by nanoindentation is initiated by the generation of dislocations.…”
Section: Nanoindentation Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of its further development, an increase of the stress led to the creation of new dislocations with a Burgers vector of and ( Figure 3 d,f). This result demonstrates the phenomenon suggested by a result of the literature data analysis, which indicates that doping the InP causes an increase in microhardness [ 32 ] as well as suppression of the dislocation generation during crystal growth [ 33 , 34 ]. The effect of doping on the development of dislocation structure is of stochastic nature, due to the thermal randomness of both the generation of dislocations and the location of point defects in a crystal lattice.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Although Si can be considered as residual impurity, the Si concentration is under the detection limit of GDMS (< 5 Â 10 14 cm --3 ). Because InP polycrystals were synthesized by the HB (Horizontal Bridgmann) method using a pBN (pyrolytic boron nitride) boat instead of SiO 2 boats [18,32], InP single crystals were purified by the gettering effect of the B 2 O 3 encapsu- [18] and Si remained in the InP melt during crystal growth due to impurity segregation [11,32]. Furthermore, the deep levels of phosphorus related defects have been reported by several authors.…”
Section: Compensation Mechanism Of Annealed Si Inpmentioning
confidence: 99%