Corrosion Tests and Standards: Application and Interpretation—Second Edition
DOI: 10.1520/mnl11032m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chapter 26—Environmental Cracking-Corrosion Fatigue

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison to fatigue in air, corrosion fatigue is more complex and requires the consideration of more variables such as load frequency and chemical properties of the water. Although the exact contributions to corrosion fatigue remain unclear due to difficulty in differentiating between all mechanisms during experimentation, hydrogen embrittlement and anodic dissolution are commonly identified as the main driving factors (Gangloff 2009;Kang et al 2011;Salivar et al 1981). Hydrogen embrittlement increases crack growth rate by making the material around the crack more brittle.…”
Section: Underwater Fatigue Crack Growth In Steelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In comparison to fatigue in air, corrosion fatigue is more complex and requires the consideration of more variables such as load frequency and chemical properties of the water. Although the exact contributions to corrosion fatigue remain unclear due to difficulty in differentiating between all mechanisms during experimentation, hydrogen embrittlement and anodic dissolution are commonly identified as the main driving factors (Gangloff 2009;Kang et al 2011;Salivar et al 1981). Hydrogen embrittlement increases crack growth rate by making the material around the crack more brittle.…”
Section: Underwater Fatigue Crack Growth In Steelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hydrogen in water absorbs into crack surfaces and interferes with grain boundary cohesion. Anodic dissolution occurs as the newly exposed material from crack growth reacts with the water and is dissolved (Gangloff 2009). In the air, loading frequency has little effect on fatigue crack growth rate in steels.…”
Section: Specimens' Failure Modementioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. In the following classification when K max < K ISCC the fatigue refers as True Corrosion Fatigue (TCF), where the crack growth is increased by environmental effects, for example, filiform, pitting, exfoliation [12] and the CFCG rate is in the form:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the SCC is the result of a combination of 3 factors: exposure to a corrosive environment, susceptible material and tensile stresses above a threshold value [1]. Additionally, the reduction of frequency of the cycles or the increase of the load ratio triggers the SCC mechanism [12,13]. There is no unified mechanism for SCC in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the recommended curve for seawater has been proposed based on the mentioned reduction factor. Therefore, the proposed curve has the same slope for the whole region, and this is against the mechanism of corrosion fatigue of steel [2][3][4] which exhibits a larger difference between fatigue lives in corrosive and non-corrosive environments in the VHCF region than the low-cycle fatigue region [2][3][4][5][6][7]. A new theory for fatigue damage assessment is presented recently by Pavlou [8] based on S-N curves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%