2008
DOI: 10.1016/s0079-6123(07)00021-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chapter 21 Encoding-retrieval overlap in human episodic memory: A functional neuroimaging perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

27
146
4
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 179 publications
(178 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
27
146
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although we demonstrate a significant difference in reinstatement between correct and incorrect trials, one concern is that the observed differences in reinstatement arise as a result rather than a cause of successful retrieval (30). Although our experimental paradigm offers some control over when reinstatement and retrieval occur, our data are unable to explicitly distinguish causality between one and the other.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…Although we demonstrate a significant difference in reinstatement between correct and incorrect trials, one concern is that the observed differences in reinstatement arise as a result rather than a cause of successful retrieval (30). Although our experimental paradigm offers some control over when reinstatement and retrieval occur, our data are unable to explicitly distinguish causality between one and the other.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…Ben-Yakov et al rodent studies, is that retrieval entails reinstatement of brain activity that was elicited during encoding (Damasio 1989;McClelland et al 1995;reviewed in Buckner and Wheeler 2001;Rugg et al 2008;Danker and Anderson 2010;Rissman and Wagner 2012;Levy and Wagner 2013). Influential data-driven cognitive theories posited that the match between encoding and retrieval cues and between level of processing (e.g., in verbal memoranda) is pertinent for successful retrieval (Tulving and Thomson 1973;Morris et al 1977).…”
Section: Reinstatement Of Encoding Processes During Retrievalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there is compelling evidence that encoding-related brain activity is partially reinstated during retrieval, the overlapping activity is still a small fraction of the overall brain activity elicited during encoding and retrieval (Johnson and Rugg 2007;Rugg et al 2008;Daselaar et al 2009;Kim et al 2010). This may be caused by several contributing factors , such as features of the original experience that may not be encoded, or encoded but not retrieved.…”
Section: Reinstatement Of Encoding Processes During Retrievalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This idea has been manifested in the Transfer Appropriate Processing Framework, which states that the likelihood of retrieval success is dependent on the overlap between encoding and retrieval operations (Morris et al 1977;Roediger et al, 1989). Accordingly, the most effective encoding strategy depends on the specific conditions at retrieval and, conversely, what constitutes an optimal retrieval strategy depends on the conditions under which the information was encoded (Rugg et al, 2008). In line with this principle, previous behavioral studies have shown that recognition memory is enhanced when mental operations at encoding are recapitulated during a subsequent memory test (Dewhurst & Brandt, 2007;Morris et al, 1977).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…One possible strategy people use to facilitate memory retrieval is to re-implement the neurocognitive processes that were involved during encoding (Rugg et al, 2008). This idea has been manifested in the Transfer Appropriate Processing Framework, which states that the likelihood of retrieval success is dependent on the overlap between encoding and retrieval operations (Morris et al 1977;Roediger et al, 1989).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%