“…The rationale for exploring the effect of teaching on learners' pragmatic development, as Rose (2005) notes, has been underscored by Noticing Hypothesis (Schmidt, 1990), contending that simple exposure to the target language is not enough since there are pragmatic functions and relevant contextual factors which are often not salient to learners and so less likely to be noticed even after exposure for a long period of time. Unlike Krashen (1985) and Reber (1989) who claim that unconscious learning processes are better than conscious ones and are responsible for most L2 production, some other second language acquisition researchers argue that making certain forms noticeable through consciousness raising (CR) and drawing learners' attention to these forms can help learners in the language acquisition process (R. Ellis, 1995;Rod Ellis, 2008;Schmidt, 1990Schmidt, , 1993aSchmidt, , 1993bSchmidt, , 1995Schmidt, , 2001Schmidt, , 2012Smith, 1993). In earlier research on CR, the focus was on grammar instruction and learning (Fotos, 1993(Fotos, , 1994Smith, 1993), while Rose (1994) proposed pragmatic consciousness raising (PCR) as an important approach towards teaching pragmatics.…”