2018
DOI: 10.1075/ihll.15.17bes
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chapter 16. Testing English influence on first person singular “yo” subject pronoun expression in Sonoran Spanish

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One might suspect that these are integrated loanwords (borrowings) in the English of New Mexico and thus not true mixed NPs. Yet, they are all pronounced with Spanish phonology, which supports the analysis that they are examples of one-word code-switches rather than integrated loanwords (Bessett, 2017). Distinguishing between borrowings and code-switches is, however, beyond the scope of this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…One might suspect that these are integrated loanwords (borrowings) in the English of New Mexico and thus not true mixed NPs. Yet, they are all pronounced with Spanish phonology, which supports the analysis that they are examples of one-word code-switches rather than integrated loanwords (Bessett, 2017). Distinguishing between borrowings and code-switches is, however, beyond the scope of this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Reflexivity is a significant predictor in some studies (Bessett, 2018; Michnowicz, 2015; Otheguy et al, 2007; Otheguy & Zentella, 2012) and insignificant in others (Padilla, in press; Cerrón-Palomino, 2019). The consensus is that reflexive verbs do not favor SPE because they already indicate who the referent is, whereas non-reflexive verbs favor SPE.…”
Section: The Hypothesis and Predictors Analyzed In The Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carvalho & Child, 2011;Michnowicz, 2015;Orozco, 2015;Otheguy & Zentella, 2012;Torres Cacoullos & Travis, 2010;Travis, 2005), including studies solely examining 1sg SPE (e.g. Bessett, 2018;De Prada, 2015;Torres Cacoullos & Travis, 2010;Travis, 2005), overt SPs were favored in switch reference contexts (fw = .62) while same reference environments promoted nulls (fw = .37). What is striking about these results is that the proportion of overt SPs nearly doubles when there is a switch in subject reference (49% vs. 25% same reference).…”
Section: Switch Referencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…first-vs. thirdperson) respond to different contextual and interactional factors (Travis, 2005), it is important to continue the study of individual persons/numbers, thus far carried out most extensively for 1sg subjects (e.g. Bessett, 2018;De Prada, 2015;Travis, 2005Travis, , 2007Travis & Torres Cacoullos, 2012), and to a lesser extent for third-person singular (Shin, 2014), third-person plural (Lapidus & Otheguy, 2005), and first-person plural subjects (Posio, 2012;Limerick, in press). The current study aims to continue to uncover individual person/number patterns, in particular the linguistic factors that constrain SP variation by examining, separately, first-person singular (1sg) and third-person SPs in a variety of Mexican Spanish spoken in Georgia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%