2006
DOI: 10.1016/s1574-0714(06)02015-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chapter 15 Intergenerational altruism and neoclassical growth models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 The reader is referred to Michel et al (2006) for a review of altruism and Galperti and Strulovici (2017) for an axiomatic theory of intergenerational altruism.…”
Section: Equilibriummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 The reader is referred to Michel et al (2006) for a review of altruism and Galperti and Strulovici (2017) for an axiomatic theory of intergenerational altruism.…”
Section: Equilibriummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it is well‐known that economic models with externalities in preferences or technology may exhibit multiple steady states [see, e.g., Azariadis and Drazen () or Michel et al . ()], the channel highlighted in the present paper, namely changes in the attitude towards leaving bequests and indirect reciprocal behavior, has not been discussed before.…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In the former case utility function of a generation is the weighted sum of utility from own life-cycle consumption plus the next generations utility, whereas in models of paternalistic altruism bequests to the next generation have the properties of a consumption good and are evaluated according to the current generations preferences (see Michel et al, 2006). Since in our setup estimated consumption of future generations, c 1 is (for a given current capital stock) determined by the capital stock left to the following generation, u ' ð:Þ has the properties of a paternalistic altruism utility function.…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%