2006
DOI: 10.1016/s0166-526x(06)47013-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chapter 13 Thin-layer chromatography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The time from sample preparation through TLC to measurement of UV absorbance of antiretrovirals in FDC (eight samples per plate) took an average of 100 min, while with the HPLC method more than 160 min was spent on the same number of samples (20 min per sample). This implied that multiple samples can be run at a single operation per plate [26].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The time from sample preparation through TLC to measurement of UV absorbance of antiretrovirals in FDC (eight samples per plate) took an average of 100 min, while with the HPLC method more than 160 min was spent on the same number of samples (20 min per sample). This implied that multiple samples can be run at a single operation per plate [26].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[25] reported that the demonstrated capability and efficiency of TLC in direct resolution of the racemate clearly establish its superiority over HPLC. TLC provides the most simple, rapid, and cost‐effective method with low volume consumption of solvents and many samples could be run simultaneously on a plate [17,26]. Also, in recent times TLC has been hyphenated to other detection devices or instruments, such as TLC–MS [22], UTLC–MALDI–MS [27], HPTLC–UV [22], and TLC–MALDI–TOF‐MS [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%