2006
DOI: 10.1016/s1574-1400(06)02013-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chapter 13 Principal Components Analysis: A Review of its Application on Molecular Dynamics Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
89
1
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 253 publications
1
89
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, we also conclude that the specific internal motions in the 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 proteins empower them for their biological functions. Such internal motions are responsible for different conformational changes that allow the proteins to bind with their substrates with high specificity (Stein et al, 2006). In order to validate the conformational subspaces during dynamics of CK1 isoforms, we performed potential energy surface (PES) study for each trajectory (Fig.…”
Section: Essential Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, we also conclude that the specific internal motions in the 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 proteins empower them for their biological functions. Such internal motions are responsible for different conformational changes that allow the proteins to bind with their substrates with high specificity (Stein et al, 2006). In order to validate the conformational subspaces during dynamics of CK1 isoforms, we performed potential energy surface (PES) study for each trajectory (Fig.…”
Section: Essential Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we present a comparative study of three isoforms (α, δ and ε) of human CK1 with a particular emphasis on their dynamic etiquette under physiological condition in aqueous medium. Moreover, principal component analysis (PCA) of MD data was performed to reveal the conformational substates sampled during the dynamics of these kinases (Hayward and Go, 1995;Stein et al, 2006;Hayward and de Groot, 2008;Du et al, 2006;Li et al, 2009). Potential energy surfaces (PES), a contour map of potential energy as a function of conformational coordinates, were employed to confirm the conformational substates (Frauenfelder et al, 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies explore the energy landscape and the conformational states (Alakent, Doruker et al 2005;Mu, Nguyen et al 2005), identify modes contributing to protein fluctuations in MD simulation of apoadenylate kinase (Lou and Cukier 2006), and extract key mechanistic features from simulations of chemotrypsin inhibitor 2 (Palazoglu, Gursoy et al 2004). One can also refer to a comprehensive review article for further details (Stein, Loccisano et al 2006).…”
Section: Principal Components Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…43,44 Particularly, in this case, PCA is used to analyze the large amplitude motions that are difficult to visualize from a lengthy MD trajectory due to frequent small amplitude motions. We have analyzed all of the trajectories in a series of different ways.…”
Section: Protein Motionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The index of selectivity only includes the a-carbon atoms as we are interested in conformational changes involving the backbone. It has been reported that the choice of index of selectivity has a great influence on PCA 44 and therefore we have performed a scree test (scree plot) to determine how successful the reduction in dimensionality is. The scree plot shows a kink after the third eigenvector (data not shown), which means that the data is highly correlated.…”
Section: Protein Motionsmentioning
confidence: 99%