2017
DOI: 10.1075/aic.12.11van
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chapter 11. Strategic maneuvering with presentational choices in Dutch parliamentary debate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, our analysis also elucidates why it is often so difficult for other politicians to deal with populist politicians in parliamentary debate, which has indeed been true for Wilders' colleagues in the last decade. Debating with a politician who systematically violates the decency standards that regulate parliamentary debate means debating with a politician who does not accept or follow a prevailing system of norms ( van Haaften, 2011a;2011b;2017). In conclusion, we illustrate this with Wilders' response to Pechtold's criticism later in the interruption debate that we quoted in Section 3 above (see excerpt (10)).…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, our analysis also elucidates why it is often so difficult for other politicians to deal with populist politicians in parliamentary debate, which has indeed been true for Wilders' colleagues in the last decade. Debating with a politician who systematically violates the decency standards that regulate parliamentary debate means debating with a politician who does not accept or follow a prevailing system of norms ( van Haaften, 2011a;2011b;2017). In conclusion, we illustrate this with Wilders' response to Pechtold's criticism later in the interruption debate that we quoted in Section 3 above (see excerpt (10)).…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…It is an adaptation of a lecture given by van Haaften and van Leeuwen (2011). Parts of this analysis have been presented in van Haaften (2011a;2011b;2017) and van Leeuwen (2015;. Albertazzi and McDonnell, 2008, p. 7;Ostiguy, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 For a more detailed analysis of the argumentative strategies employed by Wilders in the Dutch Lower House, see van Haaften (2017). Wilders' presentational choices have been the object of study by other scholars as well but from different perspectives.…”
Section: An Illustration: An Argumentative Strategy Employed In the Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pragma-dialectics and strategic maneuvering have been examined in a number of domains including the medical domain (Goodnight, 2009;Goodnight & Pilgram, 2011;Pilgram, 2017;van Poppel, 2017), the legal domain (Feteris, 2009(Feteris, , 2017Jansen, 2017), and the political domain in which previous research has focused on political interviews (Andone, 2009(Andone, , 2013Andone & Gata, 2011), political speeches (Ietcu-Fairclough, 2009;Mohammed & Zarefsky, 2011), press conferences (Peng, 2017;Peng & Zhu, 2015) and debates (Doury, van Haaften & Snoeck Henkemans, 2011;Eckstein & Lefevre, 2017;Plug, 2017;Snoeck Henkemans, 2017;Toader, 2016, van Eemeren & Garssen, 2012van Haaften, 2017;Zarefsky, 2009). To the researcher's knowledge, strategic maneuvering has not been studied in the hearings held in the U.S. Congress nor in non-political issues that are investigated in this legislative body.…”
Section: Strategic Maneuveringmentioning
confidence: 99%