2015
DOI: 10.1039/9781849737876-00275
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CHAPTER 11. Engineering Venom Peptides to Improve Their Stability and Bioavailability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(46 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the last decade, cyclic peptides have been discovered in animals, plants, fungi, and bacteria and offer clues toward improving the stability of peptides (25)(26)(27). Head-to-tail cyclic peptides are typically more resistant to thermal or enzymatic degradation than their linear counterparts (28,29). Improving the stability of conotoxins in biological fluids using backbone cyclization was initially inspired by research into naturally occurring cyclic The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last decade, cyclic peptides have been discovered in animals, plants, fungi, and bacteria and offer clues toward improving the stability of peptides (25)(26)(27). Head-to-tail cyclic peptides are typically more resistant to thermal or enzymatic degradation than their linear counterparts (28,29). Improving the stability of conotoxins in biological fluids using backbone cyclization was initially inspired by research into naturally occurring cyclic The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…peptides (29,30) and is a proven strategy to improve the stability of peptides, including conotoxins (31). For example, the stability of ␣-conotoxins MII, ImI, Vc1.1, RgIA, AuIB, and -conotoxin MrIA was significantly improved through backbone cyclization, and most of the cyclic peptides had similar or improved activity compared with their parent peptides (32).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%