2017
DOI: 10.1075/silv.20.11sch
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chapter 11. Developmental sociolinguistics and the acquisition of T-glottalling by immigrant teenagers in London

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
29
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In the future, it will be interesting to explore further which aspects of language‐internal variability are amenable to wholesale replication in newly evolving ‘non‐native’ speaker varieties. Much of the sociolinguistic argument defending the supremacy of face‐to‐face interactions in scenarios involving language contact and second language (dialect) acquisition relies on evidence stemming from phonological variables (Labov, ; Schleef, ; Schleef, Meyerhoff, & Clark, ). These nearly always show highly complex conditioning, involving not only (in some cases highly detailed) phonetic conditioning, but also laborious patterns of morphosyntactic and lexical conditioning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the future, it will be interesting to explore further which aspects of language‐internal variability are amenable to wholesale replication in newly evolving ‘non‐native’ speaker varieties. Much of the sociolinguistic argument defending the supremacy of face‐to‐face interactions in scenarios involving language contact and second language (dialect) acquisition relies on evidence stemming from phonological variables (Labov, ; Schleef, ; Schleef, Meyerhoff, & Clark, ). These nearly always show highly complex conditioning, involving not only (in some cases highly detailed) phonetic conditioning, but also laborious patterns of morphosyntactic and lexical conditioning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our assumed knowledge of the social meaning of T-glottalling is derived largely from macro-sociological production data. Micro-analyses of (t) that explore more nuanced social evaluation in production data, as in Kirkham and Moore’s (2016) study of (t) in Ed Miliband’s speeches or Schleef’s (forthcoming) study of immigrant teenagers in London, remain the exception. Based on the summary above, I could expect T-glottalling to be associated with working-class speech as well as that of young people.…”
Section: Social Meaning and T-glottallingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polish migrants’ acquisition of t ‐glottaling was found to be affected by their length of residence in the United Kingdom (Schleef , Drummond ). Schleef (forthcoming) argues that the acquisition of this variable proceeds in steps, with the linguistic and social constraints being adopted incrementally. By the third year of residence, Polish migrants were found to approximate the t ‐glottaling patterns produced by their native‐born peers and to replicate many of the linguistic constraints on t ‐glottaling.…”
Section: Case Study: United Kingdommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The acquisition of native‐like linguistic constraints goes hand in hand with the acquisition of stylistic variation for t ‐glottaling, but this effect is not consistent across studies. In the work of Meyerhoff and Schleef (), conversational style favors t ‐glottaling compared to a reading style, but in the work of Schleef (forthcoming), the effect of style goes in the opposite direction. It appears, however, that Polish migrant teenagers employ t ‐glottaling to express a range of styles/personae.…”
Section: Case Study: United Kingdommentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation