2010
DOI: 10.1075/dapsac.36.14oku
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chapter 10. Performing the world of politics through the discourse of institutional correspondence in Late Middle and Early Modern England

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise, in most cases private letters lack any kind of prior planning, which also explains their being closer to orality (Danilova 2012). Other authors add important extralinguistic reasons for working with collections of private letters, such as the fact that this correspondence includes many biographical details which, in spite of their limitations, make it much easier to undertake a sociolinguistic study (Raumolin-Brunberg 2005;Okulska 2010;Elspass 2012). In the same way, by using letters it also becomes possible to discover other relevant data about the communicative act, such as the relations of power and solidarity between the sender and his or her addressees.…”
Section: The Corpusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, in most cases private letters lack any kind of prior planning, which also explains their being closer to orality (Danilova 2012). Other authors add important extralinguistic reasons for working with collections of private letters, such as the fact that this correspondence includes many biographical details which, in spite of their limitations, make it much easier to undertake a sociolinguistic study (Raumolin-Brunberg 2005;Okulska 2010;Elspass 2012). In the same way, by using letters it also becomes possible to discover other relevant data about the communicative act, such as the relations of power and solidarity between the sender and his or her addressees.…”
Section: The Corpusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Las razones para ello son diversas. Por un lado, las cartas, especialmente las de contenido privado, contienen multitud de datos de carácter autobiográfico que nos informan acerca de los principales atributos sociales de los escritores, así como de las relaciones de poder y solidaridad que los unen a sus respectivos interlocutores (Okulska 2010). Al mismo tiempo, presentan detalles etnográficos y sociales de gran interés sobre la vida comunitaria del momento en que fueron escritos (Raumolin-Brunberg 2005).…”
Section: El Corpus: Textos De Inmediatez Comunicativa Para El Estudiounclassified
“…Este tipo de textos ha demostrado resultar de gran valor para el estudio de la variación y el cambio lingüístico en periodos de la historia para los que no quedan testimonios orales, por su concepción más cercana a la oralidad que otros géneros textuales sobre los que ha descansado tradicionalmente la práctica de la lingüística diacrónica (cf. Oesterreicher 2004, Palander-Collin & Nevala 2005, Okulska 2010, Danilova 2012, Elspass 2012, Schneider 2013.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…This is especially true in the case of personal letters (Elpass, 2012). They contain many autobiographical details, which make it possible to determine the relationships of power and solidarity between senders and addressees, as well as their social status (Okulska, 2010). Likewise, they contain ethnographic information that enables researchers to unravel some of the details of social life in bygone times (Raumolin-Brunberg, 2005).…”
Section: Corpus and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%