2016
DOI: 10.1075/lal.24.10jan
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chapter 10. Effects of creative writing on adolescent students’ literary response

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This basis of prior knowledge, we argue, may well include previous life experiences. From a more domain-specific perspective, writing prior to reading may enhance students' emotional involvement in a text (Janssen & Braaksma, 2016). In addition, writing tasks assigned during and directly after reading may help students engage in internal dialogues with the texts.…”
Section: The Principle Of Writing About Personal Experiencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This basis of prior knowledge, we argue, may well include previous life experiences. From a more domain-specific perspective, writing prior to reading may enhance students' emotional involvement in a text (Janssen & Braaksma, 2016). In addition, writing tasks assigned during and directly after reading may help students engage in internal dialogues with the texts.…”
Section: The Principle Of Writing About Personal Experiencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To increase generalizability, the four creative tasks covered two genres: expressive and fictional-imaginative texts. Three tasks were designed for this study, a fourth was borrowed with permission from previous research (Janssen & Braaksma, 2016).…”
Section: Creative Tasksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They explore the use of literature in English as a Foreign Language and second language classrooms, but also on other programmes in schools and universities, as well as in the workplace and in book groups. The contributors gather evidence using an interesting range of methods, including think-aloud protocols (Janssen and Braaksma, 2016; Vassallo, 2016), student questionnaires (e.g. Zyngier and Viana, 2016), and written reader responses (Sotirova, 2016).…”
Section: Empirical Stylisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%