2019
DOI: 10.1075/celcr.22.01nac
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chapter 1. MIPVU in multiple languages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In spite of these lessons learnt, we cautiously conclude that there were no fundamental issues associated with applying appraisal analysis to these ancient texts that would call the entire operation into question. The challenges as outlined were well within the range of typical challenges associated with complex discourse analysis (Fuoli 2018; compare also Nacey et al 2019 for an entire volume on annotating metaphor across different languages, as a different complex discourse analysis aspect).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In spite of these lessons learnt, we cautiously conclude that there were no fundamental issues associated with applying appraisal analysis to these ancient texts that would call the entire operation into question. The challenges as outlined were well within the range of typical challenges associated with complex discourse analysis (Fuoli 2018; compare also Nacey et al 2019 for an entire volume on annotating metaphor across different languages, as a different complex discourse analysis aspect).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…the first paragraph of the news, usually containing the gist. In our analysis, we relied on the identification of metaphors using the MIP (Metaphor Identification Procedure) (Nacey et al, 2019;Pragglejaz Group, 2007), which involves comparing the contextual and basic vocabulary meanings of each lexical unit to identify conceptual metaphorical mappings.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gradual theoretical evolution and the continuous methodological developments of scientific inquiry related to metaphor analysis provided the literature with several proposals and procedures of metaphor analysis ( Pragglejaz Group, 2007 ; Steen et al, 2010 ; Nacey et al, 2019 ). The analysis of metaphoricity in this research benefited from attested and empirically revealing methods of metaphor identification: the Pragglejaz Group’s metaphor identification procedure (MIP: Pragglejaz Group, 2007 ) and the method for linguistic metaphor identification which was refined and extended by Steen and his team at Vrije University, therefore called MIPVU ( Steen et al, 2010 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%