2014
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12056_4.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CHAPTER 1: Considering the Standards for Foreign Language Learning in Postsecondary Instruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Graham (, ) also found that when pupils felt that FL classes were too hard this had damaging consequences for their motivation (see also, e.g., Archambault, Eccles, & Vida, ; Eccles, Lord, & Buchanan, , for similar findings related to other school subjects). Interestingly, our observations of deteriorating attitudes to language classes and decreasing intentions to study a FL are broadly in line with deterioration of other indicators of motivation observed in other longitudinal (Busse, ; Busse & Walter, ) and cross‐sectional (Magnan, Murphy, & Sahakyan, ) studies with older participants.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Graham (, ) also found that when pupils felt that FL classes were too hard this had damaging consequences for their motivation (see also, e.g., Archambault, Eccles, & Vida, ; Eccles, Lord, & Buchanan, , for similar findings related to other school subjects). Interestingly, our observations of deteriorating attitudes to language classes and decreasing intentions to study a FL are broadly in line with deterioration of other indicators of motivation observed in other longitudinal (Busse, ; Busse & Walter, ) and cross‐sectional (Magnan, Murphy, & Sahakyan, ) studies with older participants.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The development and implementation of the Standards for Foreign Language Learning in the 21st Century (National Standards in Foreign Language Education Project, ; hereafter National Standards), now the World‐Readiness Standards for Learning Languages (National Standards Collaborative Board, ), have significantly impacted the world language teaching profession by providing a framework that guides curriculum, instructional approaches, and assessments at both the national and, in many cases, the state level across much of the United States (Ohio Department of Education, ). While a number of large‐ and small‐scale research studies have examined various ways in which the standards have influenced the teaching and learning of world languages (e.g., Allen, ; Magnan, Murphy, & Sahakyan, ; Sarroub, ; Wood, ), studies of the relationship between the standards and teachers’ assessment practices have been less prevalent, including in K–12 contexts (Troyan, ). This multiple case study examined how the assessment practices of four high school world language teachers aligned with the competencies specified in their state's Learning Standards for 9–12 World Language Programs (Ohio's Learning Standards, ), which were developed from the Standards for Foreign Language Learning 1 (National Standards, ) and with the five major goal areas in that nationally accepted standards framework.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The need to extend conceptions of teacher language knowledge in mainstream (K–12) teacher education, alongside the traditional proficiency measures of formal qualifications and knowledge audits, has been slow to gather momentum despite the broader conceptualisation of language in the literature (Byrnes, ). One of the limitations cited in the call to extend the scope of the ACTFL (American Council on Teaching Foreign Languages) assessment framework, for example, is the examination of attitudes and perceptions (Phipps & Levine, ) in order to “understand better what learners think about language learning” (Magnan, Murphy, & Sahakyan, , p. 28). As stated by these authors, “the notion of the agency of an individual within multiple communities points toward what might well be the most serious, unattended to issue in the Standards” (p. 34).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%