2019
DOI: 10.1080/15567036.2019.1649757
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chaotic characteristic analysis of short-term wind speed time series with different time scales

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This type of behaviors is unstable since it tends to be deterministic at short term but random at long term. Such kind of time series are usually present in many science and engineering fields such as weather forecasting (Tian 2019), financial markets forecasting (Bukhari et al 2020), energy forecasting (Bourdeau et al 2019), intelligent transport and trajectory forecasting (Giuliari et al 2021), etc. Based on the literature (Chandra and Zhang 2012, Montgomery et al 2015, Liu et al 2017, Fischer et al 2018, the five aforementioned behaviors (deterministic, random-walk, nonlinear, long-memory, and chaotic) are the main behaviors encountered in real applications.…”
Section: Chaotic Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This type of behaviors is unstable since it tends to be deterministic at short term but random at long term. Such kind of time series are usually present in many science and engineering fields such as weather forecasting (Tian 2019), financial markets forecasting (Bukhari et al 2020), energy forecasting (Bourdeau et al 2019), intelligent transport and trajectory forecasting (Giuliari et al 2021), etc. Based on the literature (Chandra and Zhang 2012, Montgomery et al 2015, Liu et al 2017, Fischer et al 2018, the five aforementioned behaviors (deterministic, random-walk, nonlinear, long-memory, and chaotic) are the main behaviors encountered in real applications.…”
Section: Chaotic Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Time delay and embedding dimension are two important parameters for reconstructing the phase space of the time series, which can be calculated by using different approaches. e autocorrelation method [27], multiple autocorrelation method [28], and mutual information method [29] are commonly used to obtain time delay τ. e G-P method [13], false nearest neighbor method [14,27], and Cao method [29,30] are widely applied in gaining the embedding dimension. Some researchers assumed that time delay and embedding dimension are not independent of each other, so they utilized the C-C method [15][16][17][18][19] to acquire time delay and embedding dimension synchronously.…”
Section: Identification Of Chaotic Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Time delay and embedding dimension are two important parameters for reconstructing the phase space of the time series, which can be calculated by using different approaches. Tian et al [13] used the C-C algorithm to obtain delay time and calculated the embedding dimension based on the G-P algorithm for a short-term wind speed time series. Based on the condition monitoring data of a methane compressor, Niu and Yang [14] gained the reconstruction parameters (delay time and embedding dimension) by utilizing the C-C method and false nearest neighbor method, respectively, to predict the degradation trend.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the instability of wind itself, wind power generation is volatile and intermittent, which will cause serious difficulties in wind power dispatch (Wang et al, 2020). Therefore, accurate prediction of wind power can effectively alleviate the strong uncertainty brought by large-scale wind power grid connection to power system operation, which has important theoretical and practical application value (Li et al, 2020a; Tian, 2019; Tian et al, 2019). According to the characteristics of time scale, research object, dependent data, prediction model, and different implementation methods, wind power prediction methods can have many classification systems, but no matter what classification system is divided, there is no unified standard in academia and industry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%