2018
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.121.064501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chaotic Blowup in the 3D Incompressible Euler Equations on a Logarithmic Lattice

Abstract: The dispute on whether the three-dimensional (3D) incompressible Euler equations develop an infinitely large vorticity in a finite time (blowup) keeps increasing due to ambiguous results from state-of-the-art direct numerical simulations (DNS), while the available simplified models fail to explain the intrinsic complexity and variety of observed structures. Here, we propose a new model formally identical to the Euler equations, by imitating the calculus on a 3D logarithmic lattice. This model clarifies the pre… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
37
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
3
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The existence of SSs for Euler or Navier-Stokes is still controversial. In the Euler case, Chae proved that there is no backward SS (Chae 2007), but self-similar blowup behaviours with h = −1 were found on logarithmically spaced lattice (Campolina & Mailybaev 2018), or during reconnection of tent vortices (Kimura & Moffatt 2018). In the Navier-Stokes case (see Bradshaw & Tsai (2018) for a recent review), the SS necessarily has an h = −1 exponent (in agreement with the h = −1 rescaling symmetry, see Section 4.1) and blows up in finite time.…”
Section: Beyond Kolmogorov Using Multi-fractalsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The existence of SSs for Euler or Navier-Stokes is still controversial. In the Euler case, Chae proved that there is no backward SS (Chae 2007), but self-similar blowup behaviours with h = −1 were found on logarithmically spaced lattice (Campolina & Mailybaev 2018), or during reconnection of tent vortices (Kimura & Moffatt 2018). In the Navier-Stokes case (see Bradshaw & Tsai (2018) for a recent review), the SS necessarily has an h = −1 exponent (in agreement with the h = −1 rescaling symmetry, see Section 4.1) and blows up in finite time.…”
Section: Beyond Kolmogorov Using Multi-fractalsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In it is estimated that conclusions regarding finite-time singularities using the analyticity strip method would require spatial resolutions of (16 k) 3 to (32 k) 3 for the Kida-Pelz initial data. A recent study by Campolina & Mailybaev (2018) suggests that the resolution available via classical direct numerical simulation is not sufficient to investigate blowup.…”
Section: State Of the Art And Limitations In Tracing Finite-time Singularitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that such flows evolving near the edge of regularity involve the formation of very small flow structures, these computations typically require the use of state-of-the-art computational resources available at a given time. The computational studies focused on the possibility of finite-time blow-up in the 3-D Navier-Stokes and/or Euler system include Brachet et al (1983), Pumir & Siggia (1990), Brachet (1991), Kerr (1993), Pelz (2001), , Ohkitani & Constantin (2008), Ohkitani (2008), Grafke et al (2008), Gibbon et al (2008), Hou (2009), Orlandi, Pirozzoli & Carnevale (2012), Bustamante & Brachet (2012), Orlandi et al (2014) and Campolina & Mailybaev (2018), all of which considered problems defined on domains periodic in all three dimensions. The investigations by Donzis et al (2013), Kerr (2013b) and Gibbon et al (2014) and Kerr (2013a) focused on the time evolution of vorticity moments and compared it against bounds on these quantities obtained using rigorous analysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%