1998
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.58.5629
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chaos thresholds in finite Fermi systems

Abstract: The development of Quantum Chaos in finite interacting Fermi systems is considered. At sufficiently high excitation energy the direct two-particle interaction may mix into an eigen-state the exponentially large number of simple Slaterdeterminant states. Nevertheless, the transition from Poisson to Wigner-Dyson statistics of energy levels is governed by the effective high order interaction between states very distant in the Fock space. The concrete form of the transition depends on the way one chooses to work o… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

5
44
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
5
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was the approach taken in Refs. [6,8,[11][12][13][14], focusing on two quantities: The distribution of the energy level spacings and the inverse participation ratio (IPR) of the wave functions in Fock space. Both quantities can serve as a signature for chaotic behavior, the spacing distribution by comparing with Wigner's distribution [1] and the IPR by comparing with the golden rule (according to which the IPR is the mean spacing δ of the many-particle states divided by the mean decay rate Γ of a non-interacting manyparticle state [12]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was the approach taken in Refs. [6,8,[11][12][13][14], focusing on two quantities: The distribution of the energy level spacings and the inverse participation ratio (IPR) of the wave functions in Fock space. Both quantities can serve as a signature for chaotic behavior, the spacing distribution by comparing with Wigner's distribution [1] and the IPR by comparing with the golden rule (according to which the IPR is the mean spacing δ of the many-particle states divided by the mean decay rate Γ of a non-interacting manyparticle state [12]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that, by expanding |φ i over the quantum register states, |φ i = α c α |α , the coefficient c α are randomly fluctuating and have amplitudes |c α | ∼ 1/ √ N . In this regime, the complexity of the eigenstates, characterized by the entropy S i = − α |c α | 2 log |c α | 2 , is maximal, that is S i ≈ n. We note that indeed the maximum entropy criterion S i ≈ n gives the ergodicity threshold J E ∼ δ [11]. Due to quantum ergodicity, for times t >> t E c ∼ 1/J the wave function |Ψ(t) is a random superposition of the quantum register states: |Ψ(t) = α a α (t)|α , where the coefficients a α (t) have amplitudes ∼ 1/ √ N and random phases.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 suggested an approximate mapping between the problem of Fock-space localization in a quantum dot and a single-particle localization on a Bethe lattice. (See also subsequent works [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] .) Later, these ideas were extended to explore the manybody-localization (MBL) in spatially extended systems with localized single-particle states and with short-range interaction 17,18 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%