DOI: 10.1108/s1876-0562(1997)000097b005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Channels for Communicating Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
2

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Journal impact is an obvious factor affecting citations of papers inside (Cano and Lind 1991;Meadows 1998;Tainer 1991). In this study, all papers are chosen from six pre-determined journals in order to examine the influence of the perceived quality of the journal on the number of citations of its papers.…”
Section: Journal Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Journal impact is an obvious factor affecting citations of papers inside (Cano and Lind 1991;Meadows 1998;Tainer 1991). In this study, all papers are chosen from six pre-determined journals in order to examine the influence of the perceived quality of the journal on the number of citations of its papers.…”
Section: Journal Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following this initial decision, a manuscript is sent out to scholarly reviewers who assess its quality and recommend whether the manuscript is to be accepted as is, needs revision, or is rejected. 2,3 Every system, however, has its problems. Sometimes other factors influence the decision of whether or not a paper is pub-lished.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Desk-rejections usually stem from submitted work that does not fall into the journal's domain, has no significant scientific contribution, is underdeveloped, or suffers from poor editing. 1,2 One apparent difference between PS and PSPB is their use (or not) of desk rejections.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Rowland's review, on the other hand, dismisses ethical concerns such as bias, scientific fraud, and plagiarism as 'rare abuses' 4 and thus limits his survey of peer review to cost-benefit analysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%