2011 IEEE 36th Conference on Local Computer Networks 2011
DOI: 10.1109/lcn.2011.6115516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Channel sensing order for cognitive radio networks using reinforcement learning

Abstract: Abstract-This work investigates the problem of channel sensing order used by a cognitive multichannel network, where each user is able to perform primary user detection on only one channel at a time. The sensing order indicates the sequence of channels sensed by the secondary users when searching for an available channel. When using an optimal sensing order, the secondary user can find faster a free channel with high quality. Brute-force algorithms may be used to find the optimal sensing order. However, this a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to (12) and (25), it is noted that Φ2(O n , O −n ) is exactly the negative value of the expected aggregate interference level of all the potential users. Now, suppose that an arbitrary player n unilaterally changes its channel sensing order from O n to O * n while all other active players keep their sensing orders unchanged, then the change in player n's utility function is given by:…”
Section: B Robust Order Selection Gamementioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to (12) and (25), it is noted that Φ2(O n , O −n ) is exactly the negative value of the expected aggregate interference level of all the potential users. Now, suppose that an arbitrary player n unilaterally changes its channel sensing order from O n to O * n while all other active players keep their sensing orders unchanged, then the change in player n's utility function is given by:…”
Section: B Robust Order Selection Gamementioning
confidence: 98%
“…In particular, an adaptive persistent sensing order selection strategy was proposed in [10], a dynamic programming based order selection strategy in [11], and a reinforcement learning based order selection algorithm in [12]. The main difference in our work is that the active user set in each slot is randomly changing, and all the above mentioned algorithms do not converge in the presence of changing active user set.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different authors have focused on different research areas other than energy efficiency. For instance, in [5], the authors used reinforcement learning (RL) to search dynamically the optimal sensing order. However, their method is not adaptable to CRWSN.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computational complexities involved in this method make deployment in low power, battery-driven and less complex CRWSN impossible. The work in [6] proposed optimal sensing and access mechanisms, but not specifically adaptable to sensor networks for the same reason as observed with [5]. In [7], sensing time and PU activities were used to maximize the SU throughput and to keep the probability of collision below certain threshold.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OSA requires reconfigurable networks devices, called cognitive radios (CR), can adapt their behavior in response to environment stimuli [3]. For this, these cognitive devices or secondary users (SUs) need to determine by spectrum sensing when primary users are active in order to avoid causing them a harmful interference [4]. Therefore, OSA is important to utilize the licensed frequency spectrum more efficiently through opportunistic access to unused spectrum bands.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%