2014 Oceans - St. John's 2014
DOI: 10.1109/oceans.2014.7003149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Channel replay-based performance evaluation of protocols for underwater routing

Abstract: The paper presents a comparative performance evaluation of two routing protocols for underwater wireless sensor networks (UWSNs). The two protocols are the ChannelAware Routing Protocol (CARP), exemplary of a cross layer approach to underwater routing, and a simple variation of common flooding, called EFlood, where performance is enhanced by introducing random re-transmission times. The scenarios we consider are obtained via simulations and from trials at sea performed under a collaboration agreement between t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Simulations using different underwater acoustic channel models, such as empirical formulas (e.g., Urick's models [31]), the Bellhop [32] propagation simulator via the WOSS [33] interface (which includes real environmental parameters and provide more accurate results), and traces of the channel used for channel replay purposes [34]. Reuse of the same code for simulation, emulation and at-sea test mode, introducing little additional delays (in the order of milliseconds on very low-power embedded devices) with limited additional overhead per packet (few bits).…”
Section: Sunsetmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Simulations using different underwater acoustic channel models, such as empirical formulas (e.g., Urick's models [31]), the Bellhop [32] propagation simulator via the WOSS [33] interface (which includes real environmental parameters and provide more accurate results), and traces of the channel used for channel replay purposes [34]. Reuse of the same code for simulation, emulation and at-sea test mode, introducing little additional delays (in the order of milliseconds on very low-power embedded devices) with limited additional overhead per packet (few bits).…”
Section: Sunsetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two SUNSET modules have been designed to allow the use of channel replay techniques [34,39]. The first module provides functionalities for collecting channel quality information by triggering periodic packet transmissions by each node.…”
Section: Channel Replaymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A detailed description on the processing of the collected information and on the use of channel replaying with SUNSET can be found in [10].…”
Section: Channel Replaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The common flooding protocol, where each node immediately retransmits a received packet (unless it is a duplicate), does not incur in these kind of issues but it results in a large number of collisions in UASNs. EFlood [10] enhances the common flooding by letting a node wait for a random time before forwarding the packet. This allows EFlood to reduce the probability of collision when multiple nodes forward the same packet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%