2013 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2013
DOI: 10.1109/infcom.2013.6566941
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Channel quality prediction based on Bayesian inference in cognitive radio networks

Abstract: The problem of channel quality prediction in cognitive radio networks is investigated in this paper. First, the spectrum sensing process is modeled as a Non-Stationary Hidden Markov Model (NSHMM), which captures the fact that the channel state transition probability is a function of the time interval the primary user has stayed in the current state. Then the model parameters, which carry the information about the expected duration of the channel states and the spectrum sensing accuracy (detection accuracy and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
64
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
64
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In our simulation, the change of the relay position is quantified by β, the angle between the relay-PR line and the PT-PR line. This implies that our previous numerical study ( Figures 4,5,6,7 and 8) corresponds to the case of β = 0. As indicated by (14) and Figure 2 in Section 5, the feasible location region of the relay is determined by the interferences from other SUs and the transmit powers; more specifically, it is determined by the interference ratio keeping the ST1-ST2 line perpendicular to the PT-PR line as shown in Figure 3.…”
Section: Numerical Analysismentioning
confidence: 51%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In our simulation, the change of the relay position is quantified by β, the angle between the relay-PR line and the PT-PR line. This implies that our previous numerical study ( Figures 4,5,6,7 and 8) corresponds to the case of β = 0. As indicated by (14) and Figure 2 in Section 5, the feasible location region of the relay is determined by the interferences from other SUs and the transmit powers; more specifically, it is determined by the interference ratio keeping the ST1-ST2 line perpendicular to the PT-PR line as shown in Figure 3.…”
Section: Numerical Analysismentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Therefore, we can get the upper bound of the power ratio γ u ps when f 2 = 0. Furthermore, based on the observation that the SU's capacity decreases when the power ratio γ ps increases (see Equation 6), we can estimate the maximum achievable transmission capacity by substituting γ l ps into Equation 6, i.e.,…”
Section: Achievable Transmission Capacity Of the Secondary Network Wimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In CRN, secondary users are permitted to use the primary users channel without any interference. However, the channel quality may differ significantly and the good quality channel drastically decreases the spectrum efficiency for secondary user (Xing et al, 2013). In OFDM system, CP is added between the information to avoid the ISI (Inter Symbol Interference).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cognitive radio networking has been extensively studied in recent years [1][2][3][4][5][6]. The cognitive radio (CR) technique allows unlicensed users (secondary users (SUs)) to opportunistically access the licensed spectrum without interfering with licensed users (primary users (PUs)) to exploit the under-utilized portion of the spectrum [7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%