2022
DOI: 10.1002/dep2.180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Channel‐lobe transition zone development in tectonically active settings: Implications for hybrid bed development

Abstract: Channel‐lobe transition zones are dynamic areas located between deepwater channels and lobes. Presented here is a rare example of an exhumed channel‐lobe transition zone from an active‐margin setting, in the Kazusa forearc Basin, Boso Peninsula, Japan. This Plio‐Pleistocene outcrop exposes a thick (tens of metres) channel‐lobe transition zone succession with excellent dating control, in contrast to existing poorly dated studies of thinner (metres) deposits in tectonically quiescent settings. This high‐resoluti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 167 publications
(429 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The preservation of a thicker stratigraphic record for CLTZs has been explained by high aggradation rates (e.g., Pemberton et al, 2016; Figure 10), tectonically-active settings (Ito, 2008;Mansor and Amir Hassan, 2021;Brooks et al, 2022), rapid abandonment or avulsion of feeder channels before erosion into the CLTZ (e.g., Hofstra et al, 2015;Brooks et al, 2018), or a large-scale passive margin setting allowing more net aggradation (Navarro and Arnott, 2020). Nonetheless, these studies also interpret lobes and channel-fills as part of the stratigraphic succession, which points to an aggrading and interfingering succession where the CLTZ is relatively fixed, and preserved as surfaces and thinner stratigraphic units as part of a thicker succession.…”
Section: Exhumed Thin Cltzs (< 10 M Thick)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The preservation of a thicker stratigraphic record for CLTZs has been explained by high aggradation rates (e.g., Pemberton et al, 2016; Figure 10), tectonically-active settings (Ito, 2008;Mansor and Amir Hassan, 2021;Brooks et al, 2022), rapid abandonment or avulsion of feeder channels before erosion into the CLTZ (e.g., Hofstra et al, 2015;Brooks et al, 2018), or a large-scale passive margin setting allowing more net aggradation (Navarro and Arnott, 2020). Nonetheless, these studies also interpret lobes and channel-fills as part of the stratigraphic succession, which points to an aggrading and interfingering succession where the CLTZ is relatively fixed, and preserved as surfaces and thinner stratigraphic units as part of a thicker succession.…”
Section: Exhumed Thin Cltzs (< 10 M Thick)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transfer of CLTZs into the stratigraphic record has been interpreted in several outcrop studies. Based on these examples, recognition criteria for CLTZs in the rock record include: a typically thin stratigraphic expression; amalgamated erosional features; coarse-grained lag deposits; aggradational bedforms (i.e., subcritical sediment waves); soft-sediment deformation; interfingered or juxtaposed erosional and depositional elements; and sand-rich hybrid beds in proximal lobes (e.g., Bravo and Robles, 1995;Ito, 2008;Pyles et al, 2014;Van der Merwe et al, 2014;Hofstra et al, 2015;Brooks et al, 2018;Hofstra et al, 2018;Brooks et al, 2022). However, recognition criteria for distinguishing CLTZs and CMEZs in the rock record have not been established.…”
Section: Dynamic Settings and Building A Stratigraphic Recordmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Increasing CLTZs have been found in ancient stratigraphic records (e.g. Baas et al, 2021;Brooks et al, 2022;Brooks, Hodgson, Brunt, Peakall, Hofstra, & Flint, 2018;Brooks, Hodgson, Brunt, Peakall, Poyatos-Moré, & Flint, 2018;Chen et al, 2021;Hansen et al, 2021;Hofstra et al, 2015Hofstra et al, , 2018Pohl et al, 2022;Yang et al, 2022) and in modern environments (e.g. Luo et al, 2021;Zhou et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%