2006
DOI: 10.3133/ds179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Channel gains and losses in the Opequon Creek watershed of West Virginia, July 25-28, 2005

Abstract: Horizontal coordinate information is referenced to the North American Datum of 1983 (NAD 83). Vertical control information is referenced to the National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 (NGVD 29). Altitude, as used in this report, refers to distance above the vertical datum. Temperature in degrees Fahrenheit (°F) may be converted to degrees Celsius (°C) as follows:°C

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study is based on stream discharge measurements obtained during similar base-flow conditions during July 25-28, 2005, andon May 4, 2006. During these periods, the base-flow discharge provided by ground-water outflow to streams in the study area was approximately half of the longterm mean annual ground-water recharge rate estimated by Kozar and Mathes (2001).…”
Section: Hydrologic Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This study is based on stream discharge measurements obtained during similar base-flow conditions during July 25-28, 2005, andon May 4, 2006. During these periods, the base-flow discharge provided by ground-water outflow to streams in the study area was approximately half of the longterm mean annual ground-water recharge rate estimated by Kozar and Mathes (2001).…”
Section: Hydrologic Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Streamflow at USGS gaging station 01616500 Opequon Creek near Martinsburg averaged 100 ft 3 /s (44,900 gal/min) on May 4, 2006, a value that is approximately equivalent to the 45-percent duration of summer flows reported by Wiley (2006) It was not possible to define all of the hydrologic factors affecting the results of this study. Pumps were noted as running July 25-28, 2005, at Kilmer Spring and at Lefevre Spring, but outflow measurements were not adjusted because the amount of diversion was unknown (Evaldi and Paybins, 2006). Other unknown diversions or interbasin transfers of water could have occurred during the study.…”
Section: Hydrologic Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations