2010
DOI: 10.1039/b809405p
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Channel forming organic crystals: guest alignment and properties

Abstract: Purely organic solid state materials providing nanometre sized parallel channels are suited for physical property design. In this tutorial review, key materials in this field are reviewed along with new directions forming porous covalent and polymeric networks. Among many known host materials, perhydrotriphenylene (PHTP), tris-(o-phenylenedioxy)-cyclotriphosphazene (TPP) and members of the 2,4,6-tris-(4-halo-phenoxy)-1,3,5 triazine (4-X-POT) family are prime materials for hosting guest molecules featuring dive… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As templates to align the functional materials in a 1‐D manner, not only porous coordination polymers (PCPs) having various pore size, shape or porous surface states are good candidates but also porous organic materials . In particular, the latter is available as templates to construct new 1‐D functional ‘organic’ materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As templates to align the functional materials in a 1‐D manner, not only porous coordination polymers (PCPs) having various pore size, shape or porous surface states are good candidates but also porous organic materials . In particular, the latter is available as templates to construct new 1‐D functional ‘organic’ materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More interestingly, the desolvated HOF‐8 a demonstrates permanent porosity with highly selective adsorption of CO 2 over N 2 /H 2 (Figure ), as well as adsorption of C 6 H 6 over other hydrocarbons (i.e., n ‐hexane, cyclohexane, toluene, or pxylene) at ambient temperature. Of special note, the adsorption of CO 2 for HOF‐8 a at 298 K and 1 atm (57.3 cm 3 (STP)⋅g −1 ) is higher than that of any other crystalline porous organic materials reported in the literature …”
Section: Single‐component Porous Organic Molecular Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Milling in the presence of a 1 : 1 mixture of PhMe and H 2 O affords the trinuclear complex 11 , composed of three pentacoordinate Zn( SQ ) 2 units surrounding a central TPVB ligand. (§ §Crystallographic data: compound 3 : Zn 2 SQ 4 Py 2 , (CCDC ), orthorhombic, Pbca , a = 10.8810(16) Å, b = 19.5543(28) Å, c = 29.4419(42) Å, Z = 4, R 1 = 0.083, w R 2 = 0.136 (for 4206 reflections with I ≥ 2 σ I ), R 1 = 0.177, w R 2 = 0.163 (for all reflections), S = 1.056; compound 4 : Zn SQ 2 Py 2 , (CCDC ), monoclinic, P 2 1 / c , a = 10.671(5) Å; b = 19.665(9) Å; c = 17.723(8) Å; β = 97.137(7)°; Z = 4, R 1 = 0.108, w R 2 = 0.137 (for 3107 reflections with I ≥ 2 σ I ), R 1 = 0.108, w R 2 = 0.193 (for all reflections), S = 1.015; compound 5 : Zn SQ 2 NMI , (CCDC ), orthorhombic, Pbca , a = 12.2437(8) Å, b = 18.3841(11) Å, c = 30.3846(19) Å, Z = 8, R 1 = 0.049, w R 2 = 0.093 (for 3668 reflections with I ≥ 2 σ I ), R 1 = 0.120, w R 2 = 0.126 (for all reflections), S = 0.992; compound 6 : Zn SQ 2 NMI 2 , (CCDC ), monoclinic, P 2 1 , a = 10.6541(9) Å, b = 19.7432(17) Å, c = 17.8899(15) Å, β = 99.193(1)°, Z = 4, R 1 = 0.058, w R 2 = 0.137 (for 4265 reflections with I ≥ 2 σ I ), R 1 = 0.108, w R 2 = 0.163 (for all reflections), S = 1.016; compound 7 : Zn SQ 2 Phen , (CCDC ) monoclinic, P 2 1 / c , a = 10.404(3) Å, b = 32.256(8) Å, c = 13.672(3) Å, β = 111.664(4)°, Z = 4, R 1 = 0.081, w R 2 = 0.175 (for 2973 reflections with I ≥ 2 σ I ), R 1 = 0.289, w R 2 = 0.297 (for all reflections), S = 1.066; compound 9 : [Zn( SQ ) 2 ] 2 ( BVPB ), (CCDC ), monoclinic, P 21/ n , a = 12.6164(1) Å, b = 18.4537(2) Å, c = 15.3934(2) Å, β = 103.538(1)°, Z = 4, R 1 = 0.0334, w R 2 = 0.1042 (for 5329 reflections with I ≥ 2 σ I ), R 1 = 0.0428, w R 2 = 0.1152 (for all reflections), S = 0.854; compound 10 : [Zn( SQ ) 2 ]( BVPB )·toluene, (CCDC ), monoclinic, P 2 1 / n , a = 7.6947(9) Å, b = 13.1945(15) Å, c = 27.271(3) Å, β = 95.507(2)°, Z = 2, R 1 = 0.058, w R 2 = 0.117 (for 3753 reflections with I ≥ 2 σ I ), R 1 = 0.132, w R 2 = 0.143 (for all reflections), S = 1.001; compound 11 : [Zn( SQ ) 2 ] 3 ( TVPB )·toluene solvate, (CCDC ) triclinic, P 1, a = 15.4724(16) Å, b = 15.4781(16) Å, c = 28.908(3) Å, α = 78.730(4)°, β = 88.358(4)°, γ = 60.122(3)°, Z = 2, R 1 = 0.1496, w R 2 = 0.3209 (for 15 246 reflections with I ≥ 2 σ I ), R 1 = 0.1811, w R 2 = 0.3344 (for all reflections), S = 1.216.) Crystal structure analysis reveals that the trigonal complexes arrange into a loosely packed structure 7476 with highly disordered solvent molecules occupying otherwise vacant cavities. According to thermogravimetric analysis, the included solvent is removed by heating at 50 °C under reduced pressure.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%