2021
DOI: 10.3390/s21175800
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Channel Exchanging for RGB-T Tracking

Abstract: It is difficult to achieve all-weather visual object tracking in an open environment only utilizing single modality data input. Due to the complementarity of RGB and thermal infrared (TIR) data in various complex environments, a more robust object tracking framework can be obtained using video data of these two modalities. The fusion methods of RGB and TIR data are the core elements to determine the performance of the RGB-T object tracking method, and the existing RGB-T trackers have not solved this problem we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 55 publications
(69 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To evaluate the superiority of our proposed method, we compare our method with some existing state-of-the-art RGB-T trackers, including MANet [17], DAFNet [6], Net [39], TODA [28], MACNet [30], CAT [12], CEDiMP [38], SiamCDA [36], mfDiMP [31], FANet [40], CBPNet [27], MANet++ [33], JMMAC [32], ADRNet [33], TFNet [41], MFGNet [25], M5LNet [23], HMFT [34], APFNet [26] and MFNet [35], on three challenging datasets. Considering that existing methods usually employ different training datasets, we use the LasHeR training set to retrain some of these algorithms for fair comparisons, including FANet * , DAFNet * , MANet * and mfDiMP * .…”
Section: Comparison With the State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the superiority of our proposed method, we compare our method with some existing state-of-the-art RGB-T trackers, including MANet [17], DAFNet [6], Net [39], TODA [28], MACNet [30], CAT [12], CEDiMP [38], SiamCDA [36], mfDiMP [31], FANet [40], CBPNet [27], MANet++ [33], JMMAC [32], ADRNet [33], TFNet [41], MFGNet [25], M5LNet [23], HMFT [34], APFNet [26] and MFNet [35], on three challenging datasets. Considering that existing methods usually employ different training datasets, we use the LasHeR training set to retrain some of these algorithms for fair comparisons, including FANet * , DAFNet * , MANet * and mfDiMP * .…”
Section: Comparison With the State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%