2007
DOI: 10.1093/ietcom/e90-b.6.1555
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Channel Estimation for OFDM Systems with Transparent Multi-Hop Relays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, the unitary transformation matrix M i is necessary for each relay terminal in the training section. This explains those channel estimators in [10,11] designed for broadband AF cooperative communication cannot be extended straightforwardly to the multiple relays scenario in the two-hop protocol. Each concatenation channel h SRi ⊗ h RiD , where i = 1, .…”
Section: Lmmse Channel Estimation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consequently, the unitary transformation matrix M i is necessary for each relay terminal in the training section. This explains those channel estimators in [10,11] designed for broadband AF cooperative communication cannot be extended straightforwardly to the multiple relays scenario in the two-hop protocol. Each concatenation channel h SRi ⊗ h RiD , where i = 1, .…”
Section: Lmmse Channel Estimation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the assumption of flat-fading channels, [8,9] propose trainingsequences-aided least square (LS) and linear minimum mean square error (LMMSE) channel estimators for single-relayassisted cooperative diversity systems in cellular networks. In [10,11], minimum variance unbiased (MVU) and LS channel estimators are introduced respectively for orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM-) based singlerelay-assisted cooperative diversity systems over frequencyselective fading channels. The channel estimators developed in these literatures only consider the single-relay-assisted cooperative communication scenario.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%