2018
DOI: 10.1071/eg17057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Channel edge detection using 2D complex shearlet transform: a case study from the South Caspian Sea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally speaking, it divides the source images into low-pass and high-pass subband images in different levels, i.e., the approximately sparse representation of the source images and the obvious feature information of the images. Different from the discrete wavelet, contourlet, and shearlet, the complex shearlet is realized based on the multi-scale pyramid filters and the Hilbert transform [19,20]. e former gives the multiple partitions of the image, and the latter provides the directional sub-bands in the complex space.…”
Section: E Complex Shearlet Transformmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally speaking, it divides the source images into low-pass and high-pass subband images in different levels, i.e., the approximately sparse representation of the source images and the obvious feature information of the images. Different from the discrete wavelet, contourlet, and shearlet, the complex shearlet is realized based on the multi-scale pyramid filters and the Hilbert transform [19,20]. e former gives the multiple partitions of the image, and the latter provides the directional sub-bands in the complex space.…”
Section: E Complex Shearlet Transformmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous versions of E(f, y) and R(f, y) that are based on complex-valued shearlets [60,44,62] were already successfully applied in different feature extraction tasks such as the detection and characterization of flame fronts [62,44], the detection of borders of tidal flats in the Wadden Sea [44], the extraction of fracture-traces in rock masses [13], the detection of channel boundaries in seismic data [41,42], and the automated detection of the boundaries of touching cells in scanning electron (SEM) images [55].…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%