2016
DOI: 10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20163435
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changing trends in cesarean delivery: rate and indications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall there is increase in CS rates all over the globe, Mittal et al showed rise of CS rate from 17.15 % in 2001 to 28.93 % in 2011. 9 Present study results also showed rise from 26% in 2006 to 27.6 % in 2011 to 32.47% in 2016 which were also consistent with other authors Barber et al, Ba'aqeel et al, Swapna et al, Agarwal M et al 8,[10][11][12] Studies conducted by authors across different countries showed increased rate of CS. Litorp et al, has shown much higher rates up to 49 % in 2011.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Overall there is increase in CS rates all over the globe, Mittal et al showed rise of CS rate from 17.15 % in 2001 to 28.93 % in 2011. 9 Present study results also showed rise from 26% in 2006 to 27.6 % in 2011 to 32.47% in 2016 which were also consistent with other authors Barber et al, Ba'aqeel et al, Swapna et al, Agarwal M et al 8,[10][11][12] Studies conducted by authors across different countries showed increased rate of CS. Litorp et al, has shown much higher rates up to 49 % in 2011.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…4 WHO advises that caesarean rate should not be more than 15% with evidence that CS rates above 15% are not associated with additional reduction in maternal and neonatal mortality and morbidity. 5,6 To conduct vaginal birth after caesarean delivery the institute must fulfil ACOG criteria. 7 This study is aimed to find out whether there is changing rate of CS, along with its indications over a period of last decade.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study by Agarwal M et al, in a low resource setting, increase in the primary caesarean rate was due to increase in incidence of foetal distress (9.2%) and NPOL (2.4%). 24 R Subhashini et al concluded that a major cause for elective CS was CPD, 23.08%. 11,25 This was similar to the study by B. S. Dhillon et al, where the incidence of CPD was 52.9% in both these studies incidence of CPD was much higher than in the study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,5,6 There is increase in trend in both primary and repeat caesarean rate. 7 Although WHO has recommended that CS rates should not be more than 15%, as rates above these are not beneficial, the incidence of CS rates is increasing. 8 In commonly cited causes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%