2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2017.01.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changing trends in antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of bacterial isolates in a burn unit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
27
1
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
5
27
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…aureus (12%) has been reported in other studies [1,5]; the prevalence of P. aeruginosa in the present study was comparable to that in the previous report [5]. Moreover, S. aureus (25%) followed by P.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…aureus (12%) has been reported in other studies [1,5]; the prevalence of P. aeruginosa in the present study was comparable to that in the previous report [5]. Moreover, S. aureus (25%) followed by P.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…However, other Gram negative isolates like Acinetobacter may also be found in burn wounds [1,5,29]. In the present study, E. coli (28.4%) was the most prevalent bacterial species as similar to other reports [13] followed by P. aeruginosa (22.2%), S. aureus (19.6%), K. pneumoniae (16.4%), and coagulase-negative staphylococci (13.3%) ( Tables 1 and 2).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations